IRS warns of scam
Scam attempts to trick consumers into giving out personal and banking data.
Archive for December, 2002
Posted by taxguru on December 3, 2002
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on December 3, 2002
PRC Fiscal Futility
Here’s a good summary of why California is doomed to always have such extreme budget problems. It’s a typical grasshopper state, setting up all kinds of spending programs using idiotic revenue predictions based on what comes in during the best years and ignoring the reality of down-turns. It’s a little difficult to feel sorry for idiots who are this incompetent at financial forecasting, or the fools who vote for them.
KMK
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on December 3, 2002
Most states with prepaid college tuition plans are forced to raise rates
Another example of why official statistics are not to be trusted. They are no more than SWAGs (scientific wild ass guesses). The states are no better at predicting tuition fees than they are at predicting future revenues.
KMK
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on December 2, 2002
Breaking Promises
For as long as I’ve been in this business, I’ve been warning people that the entire Social Security system is built on a teetering house of cards and that people in my and later generations will end up being stiffed when we retire, even after paying in hundreds of thousands of dollars during our working lives.
Although I don’t think it is in the least bit fair, I still believe that to be the case and continue to believe that the only salvation for the bankrupt SS system is to install a means test for who will receive benefits. Anyone who has a net worth over a certain amount specified by our rulers in DC, or an annual income above a certain level (also specified by our rulers) will receive no SS benefits, regardless of how much had been paid in to the imaginary trust fund. This will increase the demand for services of those who assist in impoverishment planning, which currently deals mainly with qualify people for Medicaid assistance.
When I tell people this, they almost always express disbelief and claim the government would never break such a sacred promise as the one to support us in our golden years. As one who believes that we can learn from history, I have to remind them of examples of broken promises from our esteemed rulers in DC, starting from the treaties with the native American Indians to the current taxation of SS benefits in spite of the original promise that they would always be tax free to compensate for no deduction for the payments into the system.
I just came across this story of how the Feds are quite openly breaking the agreement that existed with military veterans who served for 20 years or more to cover their lifetime medical costs. For those skeptics who believe in the Social Security Tooth Fairy, ask yourself this. If the Federal government has no qualms about stiffing men and women who risked their lives for the security of this country, what’s to stop them from doing the same thing to everyone who has paid in and has been counting on a monthly retirement check from the SSA?
KMK
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on December 2, 2002
Cut fraud instead of hiking taxes
This is a question I hope more people ask. Why are the taxpayers the first place our rulers look to when they have budget problems, when they should be reducing the huge amounts of money lost through fraud and incompetency?
KMK
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on December 2, 2002
This is an interesting issue, on which I’m not sure exactly how it should be. On one hand, I’m opposed to taxes and any impediment to the free use of one’s money. If these people earn the money, and are in the USA legally, they should be allowed to spend it or send it where or however they choose.
However, if they are pleading poverty and therefor receiving a lot of services for free that the rest of us have to pay for, there may be some merit to having them pay some kind of fee or tax to reimburse the taxpayers who are subsidizing them. This is also similar to the argument against repealing the sales tax on food and medicine that I heard during the recent campaign season. Many people wanted to keep the sales tax on food and medicine just for the specific reason to force Mexican immigrants to pay something in taxes, since they spend a good portion of their disposable income on food.
This is no longer just an issue for border states, such as the PRC. Here in NorthWest Arkansas, there is a fast growing population of Mexicans who work for the Tyson poultry plants. Just a few weeks ago, I was behind a woman in a Conoco station who was using their Western Union service to wire some money back to Mexico and there were several others in line to do the same thing.
KMK
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on December 2, 2002
State of the states: budgets in crisis
Several “grasshopper” states are suffering the consequences for poor planning and wild spending programs.
KMK
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

