Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 330,377 hits
  • Posts By Day

    February 2003
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    2425262728  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for February, 2003

Posted by taxguru on February 15, 2003

Non-Resident State Taxes

I’ve written a lot on establishing a tax home in a low-tax or no-tax state, such as Texas, Florida, Nevada or Washington. While that kind of step exempts most kinds of investment income from state income taxes, it doesn’t necessarily eliminate state taxes on income that was earned within a taxable state from services rendered or from property located inside that state. Rent income earned from a property located in a taxable state has to be reported on a tax return with that state, regardless of where the owner lives.

Likewise, when property inside a taxable state is sold, a tax return has to be filed reporting the resulting profit, loss or tax deferred exchange that was done. For example, we have helped hundreds of people dispose of high gain real estate located in the PRC and reinvest the proceeds into new properties in low or tax free states. All of the tax on the profits from the PRC properties is deferred and rolled over into the replacement property. If those people ever sell the replacement property and don’t do a 1031 exchange, they will technically have to report the previously deferred gain to the PRC and pay the tax on that. However, there is an element of the honor system in this because if the property is located in another state, the California Franchise Tax Board will literally be out of the loop in terms of knowing anything about the sale, unlike the situation for sales of California property.

Compensation for personal services is a little trickier and depends on how your employer reports it. As this article in the Wall Street Journal discusses, many states have what they call a “Jock Tax” to get their share of income tax from highly paid athletes and entertainers who perform inside the state. Their income for the year has to be prorated between the various states in which they performed and they have to file income tax returns for all of those that have income taxes. While many athletes and entertainers have established Florida as their official tax home, they are still keeping their tax preparers quite busy preparing tax returns for each of the states in which they earned income.

There are tricks that can be used to disguise where the income was actually earned. A good creative and aggressive tax advisor can help set those up.

KMK

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 15, 2003


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 14, 2003

IRS Response To Tax Protestors

IRS has updated their response to many of the bogus arguments used by tax protestors. You can even download a more detailed 36 page pdf document covering these points. It pretty well speaks for itself and is consistent with what I have been saying forever, that the arguments are complete garbage and anyone who tries to use them to avoid filing tax returns will get a well deserved stay in the Fed’s gray bar hotel.

KMK

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 14, 2003

With friends like him…


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 14, 2003

1099 Discrepancies

A common situation when setting up a new corporation is discrepancies with 1099s by customers. They are required to be submitted to IRS for unincorporated payees, but no 1099 reporting is required for payments to corporations. What often happens is a customer includes payments that were made to one’s corporation or deposited into the corp’s bank account under the person’s unincorporated ID number. While it would be best to have them correct the 1099, that isn’t always possible and in fact is not even a big deal.

Some people think this means they have to pay the much higher personal and self employment taxes on this erroneously reported income. Not true. As I mentioned earlier, the amount of income you pay tax on is not dependent on the 1099s. I have had this situation hundreds of times with clients and have worked out a simple way to avoid any IRS problems. To avoid a nasty-gram from IRS when they match up 1099s with 1040s, it’s essential to report gross receipts at least as high as the amounts reported as income to you personally on 1099s. Then, in either the Cost of Goods Sold or Other Expenses section of the Schedule C, include an entry for “Income Deposited Into Corporate Account and Reported On Its 1120” to back out that income and avoid double taxation of it. I usually include another attached statement explaining about the newly formed corporation (giving its FEIN) and how erroneous 1099s are being handled. IRS has never had a problem with my reporting these in this manner.

As I have mentioned on several occasions, this kind of additional self defense info is one of the reasons I refuse to accept electronic filing of income tax returns. There is no place to explain such discrepancies in that format.

KMK

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 13, 2003

Enron Tax Tricks

Maybe it’s because I have long made a good living helping people win the tax game; but I can’t share the disgust over the fact that Enron had a large staff with the sole purpose of structuring things to minimize taxes. My disgust is with the rulers in DC who force companies to devote so much manpower to such tasks with their idiotic and outright punitive tax laws and regulations. I can still remember many of my college classes, where we were taught that the main function of a corporation’s management is to maximize the return (aka profit) for the shareholders. Minimizing taxes is just as important in that equation as reducing other overhead costs, such as labor and rents.

KMK

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 13, 2003

Economists For Sale

It’s long been common knowledge that opinions of economists can be purchased in exactly the same way as murder defendants buy the “expert testimony” of psychologists. The fact that a bunch of left wing economists don’t want people to be able to keep any of their own money is nothing new and no big deal.

KMK

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 13, 2003


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 12, 2003

Libertarians have more fun–and make more sense

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 11, 2003

Let It Snow

The new Treasury Secretary seems to be on the right track in support of lower taxes.

In his own words

Larry Kudlow’s take

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on