American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 – Nice summary of the newest tax law from QuickFinders.
Posted by taxguru on November 3, 2004
IRS Disputes Watchdog’s Audit Report
Tax Reform Warning – A message that I have always made, that the only way a national sales tax would be a good idea is if the 16th Amendment is repealed so that we don’t end up with both income and sales taxes instead of just one or the other.
IRS Reveals Less Cheating by Businesses, Its Data Show – Of course, since they have always intentionally inflated the extent of the underground economy in order to justify their expansion of powers, it’s hard to trust any statements they make in this regard.
This election is looking like a very positive step in the right direction for those of us who believe in lower taxes. The NTU has already analyzed the net effect of the change in the US Senate with this Fiscal Analysis of the Incoming Senate. Getting rid of high tax loving Senators Edwards (aka The Breck Girl), Hollings, and Puff Dashole are great developments. The Club For Growth did an excellent job in helping South Dakota finally get rid of that snake Dashole.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on November 2, 2004
A Porsche, a Fla. home, a boat – all on $900 – What is it about Florida that makes so many people do such stupid things?
Nothing growing out of Minnesota man’s bequest to New York City
Study: New York City Metro Pays Disproportionate Share of Federal Taxes
2005 SDI rate announced – W-2 wage slaves in the PRC will have a tiny tax rate reduction, but a hefty bump up in the taxable base, resulting in a net tax increase for many.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on November 2, 2004
Q:
Kerry,
Thank you for your answers. One more question. Once equipment is purchased and the Section 179 full deduction is taken, is their ever a point in time where the owner could sell the equipment, not have to recapture the amount depreciated and pay taxes on the transaction? I was told that if I took the deduction and held the equipment for five years, I could avoid the recapture tax, even though I sell the equipment five years later for the value I paid for it.
A:
You were either given incorrect information or are interpreting it improperly.
There is a potential recapture on Section 179 property if its business use percentage falls below 50% before the end of its normal MACRS recovery period (i.e. 5 or 7 years).
However, if an asset’s cost has been deducted on your tax return through Section 179 and/or regular depreciation, and fully depreciated, its cost basis on your books is zero. If you ever sell that item before you die, anything you get for it will be taxable income. Whatever you receive for it, up to its original cost, will be recapture of Sec. 179 and depreciation and subject to its 25% Federal income tax rate, plus any applicable State tax.
If you give a fully depreciated item to someone else, your cost basis carries over to that person. If s/he sells it, anything received will be taxable income and taxed as depreciation recapture.
As I mentioned in my earlier response, the only way to not have taxable income on the item’s sale is if you leave it to your heirs as part of your estate. Even though it had been fully depreciated on your personal books, its cost basis is stepped up to its fair market value. If your heirs sell it for that amount or less, it will be tax free to them.
I hope this clears this matter up for you. As always, it is crucial that you work with a professional tax advisor when considering real life transactions such as these.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Section 179 – Sales & Recapture
Posted by taxguru on November 1, 2004
This topic seems to generate a lot of questions, in spite of being one of the least complicated tax matters.
Q:
Kerry,
Can a C Corp take the full section 179 deduction and the individual take the full deduction on his 1040 as well?
For Estate Tax Purposes, If I purchase an asset and use the 179 deduction, would the value of the asset be zero in my estate?
Thank you
A:
That is one of the big benefits of using a C corp instead of an S, as I have long described on my website.
The same assets obviously can’t be claimed on both the 1120 and 1040; but if new business equipment purchases are split between the corp name and your personal name, it is possible to claim as much as $204,000 per year in Section 179 deductions.When somebody passes away, the values used for estate tax purposes are the fair market values of those items as of the date of their passing. The cost basis that the decedent had before passing away is irrelevant.
An item, such as a vehicle could have a book value for the decedent of zero (fully depreciated), yet have an estate value of much more. This stepped up basis rule is what many of us call the ultimate escape from taxes, especially in regard to assets like rental real estate. I have seen several cases where heirs have been able to start claiming nice size depreciation deductions on property that had already been essentially fully depreciated by the previous owners.
Kerry Kerstetter
Q:
I read about the section 179 on your web posting. I have a question and wonder if you can clarify this for me.
I own 100 percent of an S corp, california.
I purchased two new SUV’s, each of which is over 6K lbs. They were each approximately 50,000. Since I purchased these in June of 2004 do I qualify for all of the $100K purchase for this tax year, or was the October revision to this bill allowing only 25K for each auto retroactive to the include autos purchased “pre-october 22, 2004”?
Thanks for your help.
A:
Any SUV purchased before 10/22/04 is not subject to the new $25,000 Sec. 179 limit; so it looks like you lucked out by buying yours before that date. Of course, you have to have actually used them for business before October 22, not just purchased them, in order to be eligible for the Sec. 179 deduction.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in 179 | Comments Off on More Section 179 Questions
Posted by taxguru on November 1, 2004
No Rest for the Bleary: New Tax Turns to Ponder – Another look at some of the highlights of the latest tax law.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on November 1, 2004
Thanks to Janell Grenier of BenefitsBlog for catching this article in the online version of CPA Technology Advisor regarding blogs that focus on tax and accounting issues. I wasn’t interviewed for this article, but my blog is included in the list of recommended blogs at the end of the article along with some other very fine online resources that I check every day.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tax & Accounting Blogs