Archive for February, 2005
Posted by taxguru on February 25, 2005
Tax schemes saved 61 top firms $3.4B – The use of the word “scheme” is intended to imply illegality. I’m not vouching for these tax savings tricks. However, what may be a nasty scheme to some is just wise business management to others. To people who love big government and high taxes, anything done to reduce one’s taxes is inherently bad.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on February 24, 2005
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on One Of Many IRS Double Standards
Posted by taxguru on February 24, 2005
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on February 24, 2005
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Better Use For the Tax Codes?
Posted by taxguru on February 24, 2005
Q:
I was wondering about the tax on a land sale. I own 10 acres which I currently live on. If I sell all the land except for the parcel that my home sits on, what would my tax be considered? LTCG or income tax?
Thanks for any help.
A:
There are a number of issues to consider here.
As I explain on my website, if you also sell your house within two years of selling the surrounding land, you may be able to consider the land sale as part of the residence sale, which could have up to $250,000 of tax free profit. This would only apply if you weren’t using the land for business or rental purposes.
If you are not going to sell your home, you are looking at a taxable event with the land sale, assuming you are selling for more than you paid for it. If you bought the property as one single transaction, you will need to allocate your cost basis between the land being sold and the house and land you are keeping.
You didn’t say how long you have owned this property. If you have a gain, it will be taxed at the special long term capital gain rate (5% or 15% Federal) if you have owned it more than 12 months. If you are selling after less than 12 months of ownership, it will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates (up to 35% for Federal). State tax will be additional, unless you live in a state with no income tax.
If you will be selling for a loss, there will not be any deduction allowed if the property was only used as part of your personal residence. The tax law is very unfair in this regard; but that’s how it is.
For more details on how this will affect your taxes, you should consult with a tax pro where you can work with actual numbers.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Property Sale
Posted by taxguru on February 24, 2005
What Is Due to Expire Taxwise – It’s not bad enough having to know all of the new laws. We have to keep up on which existing ones are expiring at all different dates.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on February 23, 2005
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Taxing Stupid People
Posted by taxguru on February 23, 2005
Q:
I bought a 2004 Chev Suburban loaded to the max in December 2003, took a huge section 179 writeoff, 100 pc. We can call that purchase price ‘X’.
Unfortunately I have had to file Chapter 13 and the truck will be turned in this year (2005), probably
being sold at auction in the 20s…you say on tax guru the following
‘If you sell the previously deducted vehicles, you need to report the sales on Form 4797 and show
anything that you get for it above its depreciated book value as depreciation recapture ordinary income.
A sale only makes sense tax wise if the price you can get for it is less than the adjusted depreciated book value, so that you can claim the loss on Form 4797.’
I think I sound safe but and way you can clarify would be greatly appreciated…
A:
From what you have said, you will need to report the sale of the Suburban on your 2005 1040 via Form 4797. If you did write off its total cost on your 2003 1040, its book value is zero; which means that whatever you receive for it is taxable recapture gain.
If you are in bad enough financial shape that you had to file for bankruptcy protection, odds are that you have other losses that will more than offset the 4797 gain; which will make the actual tax hit on the disposal of the Suburban zero.
I’m sorry I can’t be of more assistance. Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in 179 | Comments Off on SUV Sec. 179 Recapture
Posted by taxguru on February 23, 2005
There has never been a shortage of misinterpretations of tax law, such as in this question we received the other day.
Help me with this one.
I understand that a vacation property can be classified as a second home. By this I mean that it actually qualifies for tax exemption as your residence when you sell it.
Is it possible to do a tax free exchange from a duplex to a condo and then sell this after a period of time, like five years, as a second home per my understanding above?
The duplex is pure rental property. The condo will be used by us and rented by a property manager when we are not using it.
My Reply:
You are correct that a vacation home can be considered as a second personal residence, which allows you to deduct its mortgage interest and property taxes on Schedule A.
You are wrong, however, in regard to the tax free exclusion of gain. That is only available for the sales of primary residences. Second homes have no tax free sale treatment. Any gain is taxable, and any loss is not deductible.
You can see the rules for tax free sales of primary residences at:
www.taxguru.org/re/primary.htm
I hope this clears this matter up for you.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Rules Are DIfferent For Primary & Second Personal Residences
Posted by taxguru on February 23, 2005
Top 5 Audit Myths – One person’s opinion. I am one of those who disagree with him on the issue of filing later to reduce audit potential. I still stand by what I have been saying for decades.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on