Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

Archive for March 1st, 2006

Fringe Benefits For Family Employees

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006

 

Redleaf National Institute, which specializes in support for child care providers, has a very interesting look at the recent Speltz Tax Court case that I mentioned a few weeks ago, where it was accepted that family employees can be compensated in the form of tax free benefits in lieu of actual paychecks. This is written by Tom Copeland, the director of RNI, who successfully represented the clients against the IRS and in Tax Court.  

 

RNI has quite a few excellent tax related articles, such as this one on how to properly document the use of family employees, which is crucial for defending their deductions, including when they are only compensated with benefits.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Fringe Benefits For Family Employees

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Selling Home, But Retaining Life Estate

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006

Q:

Subject: sale of personal residence
 
I found your article re Primary Residence sales to be very informative.  I have read several of your articles, and they have helped me a lot.  Especially in the area of 1031 exchanges. 
 
I do, however, have a question that I cannot find an answer to in the research I have done.  Perhaps you can help, and probably know the answer off the top of your head. 
 
Can you sell your personal residence and retain a life estate in the property and still qualify for the $250,000/$500,000 exclusion?  I don’t know any Arkansas state law but in Mississippi with a life estate you are no longer the legal owner of the property, but you still have the use of the property for the rest of you life.  Any help you can give me here will be greatly appreciated. 
 
Thank you very much!

A:

My first impulse was that I thought I had recalled that the sale had to be for the entire interest in the property; but I checked my reference sources and discovered that’s not the case.

Here’s the pertinent section from IRS Pub 523, which you can see online here.

Sale of remainder interest.   Subject to the other rules in this publication, you can choose to exclude gain from the sale of a remainder interest in your home. If you make this choice, you cannot choose to exclude gain from your sale of any other interest in the home that you sell separately.”

Since the sellers in your scenario are retaining the use of the property for the rest of their lives, a buyer would be purchasing a remainder interest that would give him/her complete control over the property only after the sellers pass away or relinquish their life estate.  As the IRS info says, if the latter happens and the sellers later decide to move on and sell their life estate to the original buyer, that would not be eligible for the tax free exclusion.

Retaining a life estate does add a lot of complications with the valuation of gifts and charitable donations; but seems to be much less complicated in relation to home sales.

I hope this helps.  Thanks for writing and helping me clear up this issue in my own mind.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

Thank you very much!
 
 

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on Selling Home, But Retaining Life Estate

Sec 179 Deduction

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006

Q:

Subject: another sec 179 question
 
My husband bought a new truck for his business 7/27/05

Financed (paid) $48,194.77 with a $2,707 trade in –

Truck weighs 9200 pounds and was used 80% for business (from 7/27 to 12/31/05)

IN GENERAL – what is his section 179 deduction?

Gross sales $30316

Thanks

A:

You and your husband should be working with a professional tax advisor on matters such as this.  What you pay him/her will be a tiny fraction of the tax savings you should be able to realize.

For the Section 179 and depreciation calculation, you need to add in the sales tax you paid on the new truck to get the proper cost basis to work with.  In a rough sense, the amount eligible for Section 179 is the net cost paid after the trade-in, which would be $45,487.77 (plus sales tax) multiplied by the 80% business usage, for a net of $36,390.

The actual deduction that can be claimed on your 1040 will be limited by the amount of business net (not gross) income, including from other sources, such as W-2s. 

Your personal professional tax advisor will be able to give you more specifics.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Sec 179 Deduction

Corporate Assets

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006

Q:

Subject: incorporating
I am sure this is your busy time of year but I have a couple of questions.
 
My sister and I are about to receive income from an invention or sale of a patent (probably just dreaming).
 
If we incorporate can we buy a property on a lake as a corp headquarter, stay there, have meetings there, and conduct other business (while enjoying the stay), all paid with corporate income?
 
I am retired and she has regular income.
 
Should I seek a financial advisor before doing anything and how expensive are such advisors?

A:

This is definitely something that you need to work with a competent professional tax advisor.  Whatever it costs will be tiny compared to the costs of screwing everything up by trying to do it all without proper counsel.

As with all tax issues, the burden of proving something is a legitimate tax deduction is on you.  If your corp buys a property, you will need to be able to prove that it is being used exclusively for corp business, or have some kind of reimbursement plan or W-2 income reporting policy for purely personal uses. 

You should also keep in mind that the cost of business real estate, except for land, has to be depreciated over several years, as long as 39 years.  Land can’t be depreciated at all. 

A very common mistake by business owners is thinking that all they have to do is deplete the business bank account and then there will be no taxes due.  For example, if your corp were to receive $950,000 in royalty income and then you spend every penny of that money on a nice place by the lake, you would still have a very large taxable income, and no cash available with which to pay it.

A good tax advisor can help you with this kind of thing, as well as the multitude of other issues that could cause unforeseen problems.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Corporate Assets

Falling Victim to AMT

Posted by taxguru on March 1, 2006

Q:

Subject: The AMT Tax

Mr. Kerstetter, Thank you for your website.  As always it is informative and enjoyable.  I have a quick question about the AMT.  At what income level should a family begin to worry about this tax applying?  As a side note, I am most assuredly working with a professional. 

This question is driven by a conversation I had with a good friend I work with.  He is the controller here and he believes I am getting close to falling into this bracket.  I on the other hand don’t think I am anywhere close.  Is there a general number to look for?

Once again, thanks any help you may offer.

Respectfully,

 

A:

There is no really simple answer for that. 

It’s not to be funny that I constantly refer to the AMT as an insane tax.  The extremely convoluted way in which it is calculated, as well as the fact that the thresholds haven’t been

If you take a look at the actual AMT Form 6251  you can see that the tax could conceivably kick in for singles with AMTI of $40,250 and married couples with AMTI of $58,000.  This is actually another example of the marriage penalty built into our tax code.

As I said, it really requires a computer to calculate AMT correctly.  You will generally find that it hits you more when you have high Schedule A deductions.  When it shows up on a client’s tax return, I work with the client to see if we can find ways to legitimately move any of those deductions from Schedule A to an above the line schedule, such as C, E or F, where they are more effective in reducing both TI and AMTI.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Falling Victim to AMT