Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 684 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 326,385 hits
  • Posts By Day

    April 2006
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for April 15th, 2006

The Two Extra Days

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Two Extra Days

Other Client Services

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Other Client Services

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Donating Services

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: question for blog
 
I am a film/video producer and I donated a project I made for a museum (non-profit) exhibition.
I understand that I cannot deduct “services” nor can I currently deduct an “artwork” as such. My point is that
I have created a piece of property (a finished DVD) that has tangible value. It is a professional piece of work
that would normally cost around $8000.00. I am having trouble finding tax law that will enable me to donate these sorts of projects to non-profits though I have heard of examples where this has worked. An Ad agency, for instance, will shoot a few thousand feet of film for a non-profit organization and will then donate the footage to the organization. They are deducting, I suspect, more that just the value of the film stock and processing. Thanks in advance for your advice.

A:

You are very mistaken about the value of the deduction being claimed by ad agencies.  It is a common misconception that other people are getting a better deal than you are.  They are no more able to inflate the value of their donations for tax purposes than you are.

With almost all tax issues, you have to have a cost basis in an item that is being donated.  Obviously, if you purchased an item and then turned around and donated it to a charity, you could deduct what you actually paid for it.  For things that you make yourself, you can only claim the out of pocket costs that you incurred.  The profit that you would have earned under a normal sale of the product cannot be counted as a deduction, unless you want to increase your basis in the item by reporting that profit as income subject to income and self employment tax; which would end up costing you more than twice as much in taxes as the taxes you would save by the higher Schedule A charitable donation deduction.

You really should be working with a tax pro, who will explain to you that Schedule A deductions are only worth about one half the overall tax savings as are Sch. C business deductions.  You would normally be better of running your production costs through your normal business schedule under the premise that the donation is a form of advertising and promotion for your services.  That’s how I have always handled my charitable tax and accounting work, and is what ad agencies and other businesses do.  

I am never shy about pointing out the many unfair aspects of the tax law.  On this issue, there is no such problem.  While it may still seem as if you should be able to claim much higher amounts for items you donate, the law as it is does make sense and is fair.

Again, your personal tax pro should be able to show you exactly what the differences would be between Sch A and Sch C deductions.

Good luck.  I hoped this helps you understand the matter.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Donating Services

Big refunds are nothing to brag about.

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Big refunds are nothing to brag about.

Tax Return Wish

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tax Return Wish

Selling residence received via 1031 exchange

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

 

Q-1:

Subject: Home Sale
 
Kerry,
 
My understanding regarding the $250,000/person exclusion for a primary residence home sale that had been acquired in a like-kind exchange is:
 
1. Home must be a rental for at least 12 months prior to becoming a primary residence.
2. Home must be occupied a total of 2 years in a 5 year period and have six “facts and circumstances” to establish primary residency (fed/state tax filing, voter registration, auto registration, bills and correspondence, local bank and social/religious affiliations).
3. Home can’t be sold before 5 years of ownership.
 
Questions:
 
1. If the home value is $750,000 and our exclusion is $500,000 as husband/wife, is there $250,000 capital gains only or is there also deferred gain from the exchange due?
 
2. Is there depreciation recapture tax due upon sale of the house?
 
Thanks,

A-1:

Items 1 and 2 in your summary aren’t actually as cut and dried as you imply. 

There is no statutory safe time frame for a 1031 replacement property to be used as rental before it can be safely be converted to personal usage without jeopardizing the 1031 exchange.  It is still a matter of intent at the time of the acquisition and is based on the facts and circumstances

Proving use as a primary residence is also not just a certain number of items,  It is based on the overall facts and circumstances, where obviously the more factors that make your case, the better off you will be in regard to defending your position against any IRS challenge.

The Section 121 tax free exclusion is up to $500,000 of profit for a married couple.  The key factor is the home’s adjusted cost basis.  If you were to sell your home for $750,000 with no selling expenses, and your cost basis was somehow zero (very unlikely), you would have $250,000 of taxable long term capital gain.  Each time you do a 1031 exchange, you are required to report the adjust basis of the new replacement property on Form 8824.  If done properly, this basis will generally be the latest property’s acquisition price less the cumulative deferred gains from all of the earlier properties.

Depreciation that you claimed (or could have claimed) after May 6, 1997 is subject to recapture and taxable at the special Federal rate of 25%.  With 1031 properties, this actually means that you need to trace back the depreciation on all of the previous properties that have been rolled into the one you are now selling; not just what you took on the current property. 

This can obviously get fairly complicated, which is why you need to be working with a tax pro who has experience in this area.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Q-2:

Thank you for your response Kerry.
 
As I understand you, all depreciation claimed after May 6, 1997 is subject to recapture and taxable at the special Federal rate of 25% WHEN I SELL THE HOUSE AS MY PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE. Right?
 
thanks,

A-2:

That is correct, plus any gain in excess of the $500,000 maximum exclusion for a couple.

Kerry

 

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on Selling residence received via 1031 exchange

Client Demands

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Client Demands

Bullseye

Posted by taxguru on April 15, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bullseye