Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 334,510 hits
  • Posts By Day

    April 2006
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for April, 2006

Starting A Business

Posted by taxguru on April 12, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: Starting a new business
 
Dear Kerry,

I am a wedding/event planner and I would like to open my own business in Florida.

I read your article about C vs. S corporation… how much of that would apply to my case?

I am not planning to have any employees (at least for the first 6-12 months) and, seen the nature of the business, I would not begin to take in high amounts for that same length of time… should I just begin as a sole proprietor?

I understand I will eventually need a CPA working with me but, at the moment, I do not know one I can fully trust to make the right decision for me. So I thought that, if I had your opinion, I could then have some ground to stand on when talking to or choosing  a CPA.

I hope you have a couple of minutes to spare on this matter. I understand you must receive a lot of emails and I greatly appreciate your time.

Sincerely,

A:

It’s not true that you will eventually need to work with a CPA.  You need to do that right now.  If you don’t get started on the right path from the very beginning, it may be too late for any tax pro to properly help you later on.

There are far too many options to consider and possible scenarios that can be used to achieve your goals for me to even begin via this medium.

You will need to work directly with an experienced tax pro who can analyze your unique circumstances.

Unfortunately, we don’t have anyone to whom we could refer you. If you haven’t already done so, you should check out my tips on how to select the right tax preparer for you.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Starting A Business

Capital Gains taxes

Posted by taxguru on April 12, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: long term capital gains
 
Gentlemen,
I have a question.  Lets say a person has adjusted gross income of $14,000.  Lets also say that he sold common stock and had a gain of $60,000. Long term gains.  Would he be taxed on this gain at the lower tax rate or would the gain jump him up to the higher rate and and the gain taxed at the higher rate?  Also would his adjusted gross income be increased causing him to pay the higher tax on this income also?
thank you for your answer.

A:

While the nominal rates for long term capital gains (5% and 15%) are lower than normal income tax rates, the actual effective rate on a gain can be much higher because of the dozens of penalties levied on people with higher AGI. 

This is especially bad for senior citizens who are forced to pay Federal income taxes on 85% of their Social Security benefits if their AGI, including capital gains, puts them in the “evil rich” category of $25,000 for a single person and $32,000 for a married couple. 

You personal professional tax advisor can assist you in more detail with how this would affect your particular situation.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Capital Gains taxes

Good things about Tax Day?

Posted by taxguru on April 11, 2006

From Tom Briscoe

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Good things about Tax Day?

Too literal interpretation of tax law:

Posted by taxguru on April 11, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Too literal interpretation of tax law:

Capitalizing Construction Interest

Posted by taxguru on April 11, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: Your Realestate Blogs sale of home

Hi,

Sorry I could find no other way to post to your http://www.taxguru.org blogsite (i am new to blogging).
 
I started construction on a home for myself in 2004.  I was supposed to be taking over a local business that would serve as my income to afford this home.  The business venture fell through and I was unable to afford the home.  I put the home up for sale prior to its completion to make sure I could sell it a.s.a.p. so as not to get stuck with the conversion loan, and its costs.  I sold the completed house in March of 2005.
 
 Since I never occupied the home it was never my main home.  Is there a way to include all the interest paid on the construction loan to the homes basis?  I used to be an accountant and all costs associated with acquiring an asset were part of the cost of that asset.  This would include the interest on the construction loan, and the commission paid to the brokers on the construction loan.  Is this not the case?  According to an  IRS phone advisor, the interest isn’t included in the basis of the home.    
 
I had no income and paid no taxes in 2004 and the over $7,000.00 in interest payments were paid in 2004, is this expense just …lost because the IRS feels it’s not part of the cost of building the home and asset?
This just doesn’t sound right… The interest on the loan was a necessary expense to actually build the home and therefor a cost.  This is not the mortage interest, this is a construction cost.  Am I wrong… if so, is there anyway to recup this expense

A:

You have illustrated why it’s a waste of time to try to get tax advice from the IRS on the phone.  Half the time, they are completely wrong with their answers.  Even when they are correct, they will not stand behind what they tell you.  Any info they give you over the phone has as much weight against any future IRS dispute as getting the same info from the clerk at your local 7-11 store.

You should be working with a professional tax advisor who will stand behind his/her advice.

Any experienced tax pro will confirm that it is very proper to capitalize interest on construction loans as part of the cost basis of the property.  In fact, that is a very common IRS audit adjustment, where they reclassify interest payments from immediately deductible expense to a capitalized cost.  That approach increases your tax bite because you only recover your interest expense in later years, and possibly against long term capital gains, which are subject to a lower tax rate than ordinary deductible interest expenses.

There are other tips on how to increase your cost basis and reduce your gain, which I don’t have time to detail; but any experienced tax pro can help you with.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

Sir,
 
I sincerely thank you very much for your time and consideration in ansewering my question
 
 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Capitalizing Construction Interest

Salvation Army Values

Posted by taxguru on April 11, 2006

 

From an alert reader:

Subject: Salvation Army Link

Kerry,

You have a great Web site that’s proven to be very useful to me in obtaining tax information.  I noticed on your Charity page that the link to the value of non-cash donations (Salvation Army Web site) is bad.  The correct address is: 

    www.satruck.com/ValueGuide.asp

Look forward to visiting your site often.

My Reply:

Thanks for that update.  I’ve updated the link on my website.

With the internet constantly changing, it’s a never-ending job keeping web links current; so I appreciate your noticing that outdated one for me.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Salvation Army Values

Selling Mixed Use Home

Posted by taxguru on April 11, 2006

 

Q-1:

Subject: Particular Capital Gains situation

Hello.

From 2002 to end of 2005 I rented 2 of the 3 rooms of my house. I have always lived in one room myself.

I would like to sell the home in 2006 (this year) but first I would like to estimate the capital gains tax.

Is it true that I cannot simply claim the home (my only property) as my primary residence and thereby take advantage of the $250,000 capital gains exclusion?

Must I pro-rata the rental as a portion of the home and in that way avail of some of the $250,000 capital gains exclusion.

If pro-rata were the route to take how could it be calculated, particularly since I do not rent rooms in 2006?

Thank you

A-1:

There are to many possible scenarios involved here for me to make any suggestions.

You need to work with your personal professional tax advisor to work out the best way to handle the sale of mixed use property. 

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Q-2:

Kerry Kerstetter,

Thank you for the quick reply.

There is only one scenario. I am selling the house this year but lived in it for 10 years and rented out rooms for the last 4.
I will just ask one question then, in case you would have an opportunity to re-visit this.
Can I claim some of the $250,000 or is it an all or nothing situation?

Thank you

A-2:

It is actually much more complicated than you understand.

At a bare minimum, you will have to recapture depreciation claimed since May 6, 1997.

From the way you described it, this sounds very much like a tri-plex, where two-thirds of the units were rented out and you occupied one-third as your primary residence.  Under that scenario, you would need to report the sale on your tax return as if it were a sale of two different kinds of properties.  Two-thirds of the sales price would be shown on Form 4797 as sale of rental property, with appropriate figures for the cost basis and depreciation. 

The other one-third of the sales price would be shown on Schedule D, using the appropriate cost basis for that portion of the house.  The gain on that sale would be eligible for the exclusion of up to $250,000 of profit.

If you were to wait to sell the home until more than two full years after your tenants left, the sale could be shown as one sale of a primary residence, with the full gain eligible for the $250,000 exclusion, except for post 5/6/97 depreciation.

Another issue to discus with your personal tax advisor is the possible taxes on the sale of the rental two-thirds and whether you want to do a Section 1031 like kind tax deferred exchange on that portion, which would require you to reinvest into new business, rental or investment real estate within 180 days.  You can see the rules for that on www.tfec.com.

I hope I made my point that there are several factors to analyze, and you need to do it with a qualified professional tax advisor or you could very easily make a very expensive mistake.

Good luck.

Kerry 

Follow-Up:

Kerry,
Thank you sincerely for putting your time into this.

 

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on Selling Mixed Use Home

Timely Politickle

Posted by taxguru on April 11, 2006

 

I always enjoy the weekly Politickles I receive via  email from F.R. Duplantier.  As always, he has an excellent one for this time of year.

YOURS, MINE & THE/IRS
Our bureaucracies do us disservice
When they try to coerce and unnerve us;
We must bring to an end
What no one can defend:
The Internal Revenue Service.

Also, check out his much longer Taxpayer’s Lament.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Timely Politickle

Each business has its unique expenses.

Posted by taxguru on April 10, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Each business has its unique expenses.

Adjusting 401k Contributions

Posted by taxguru on April 10, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: 401k Contributions (After-the-Fact)
 
Kerry,
 
I have just finished our tax return for 2005.  We owe $1,500 to the feds and $2,300 to the state (CA.).  I did notice (on our W2s) that both (my wife and I) are below the limit ($14,000) in our 401k contributions for the period.

Are we allowed to send these institutions additional funds in order to reduce our tax liability?  Or can we contribute to our IRA’s at our Bank in order to reduce our liability?

Please advise.

Regards,

A:

You should be working with a tax pro on matters such as this.

401k contributions are only allowed during the year in which you are being paid because they are intended to be made directly from your paychecks and reduce the taxable income for that particular year. The time to increase your 2005 contributions was before 12/31/05 through your employer’s payroll department.  Your 2005 W-2, where 401k contributions have their effects is locked in and you have to live with it.

Deductions for conventional IRAs are very small or nonexistent for people who have an employer sponsored retirement plan (including 401k) who are considered to be evil rich by our rulers in DC.  For 2005, the IRA deduction starts being phased out for couples when their Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) is $70,000 and is completely gone when MAGI reaches $80,000.  You didn’t say what your AGI is, but there’s a good chance that you are over those limits.

You also have the possible options of making nondeductible contributions to traditional or Roth IRAs; but neither of those would reduce your tax bills.

You can see more specific details in IRS’s Pub 590.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Adjusting 401k Contributions