Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

Archive for August, 2006

Posted by taxguru on August 4, 2006

Major Tax Issues on Hold Until After November – Same old story with our gut-less rulers; keep their heads buried in the sand.

…broader tax reform has been slow like molasses, say tax reform advocates.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on August 4, 2006

What’s the real federal deficit? – As many of us have long been pointing out, there is no company (even Enron or WorldCom) that uses more dishonest accounting techniques than those used every day by our imperial rulers in DC.  And are any of them ever punished for their crooked accounting?  Of course not.   

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on August 4, 2006

2006 State Sales Tax Holidays – The items included are different for each of the states that have this kind of program.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

SUV Trades & Sec 179 Recapture

Posted by taxguru on August 4, 2006

 

From a Reader:

Subject: suv
 
I have spent 2 days trying to nail down the answer with my accountant and on the internet.  You have a question posted on your website that’s similar to my question-but of course not quite.  I think this is a problem that a lot of people are going to be coming up with because of gas prices.
 
I have an SUV, over 6000 lbs purchased in 2003 for $50,000 using the section 179 SUV 6000lb deduction.  I now would like to trade it in for another SUV that does not weigh 6000+lbs.  If I trade the car in, it will be traded in for about $30,000 and the new SUV will be purchased for $22,000 with the left over trade in value (after p/o of loan) going towards the $22,000.  Will I have to pay recapture on the full $30,000 (trade in value), or just on the difference between the $22,000 and the trade in value?
 
Sincerely,


KMK:

I need a little more clarification before I can provide an answer.  You have Section 1031 issues here, as well as possible Section 179.

What is the current loan balance on your 2003 SUV?

What is the total purchase price of the new SUV – $22,000 or $52,000?

What will be the total of the loan you assume on the new SUV?

What percentage of the miles you drive the new SUV this year will be for business?

Kerry Kerstetter

Reader:

Thanks for replying.  I filled in the answers below.
 
 Sincerely,

What is the current loan balance on your 2003 SUV? $24k

What is the total purchase price of the new SUV – $22,000 or $52,000? The new suv would be $22k

What will be the total of the loan you assume on the new SUV? I will receive $8k for the trade in and that will be put towards the new suv-making the loan amount $14k

What percentage of the miles you drive the new SUV this year will be for business? 100%  I have a second car that’s used for personal miles

I read on the internet that you cannot trade in a 6000lb suv for one under 6000lb as a like kind exchange-is that true as well?

 
KMK

Thanks for the additional info. 

It sounds as if you are under the impression that there could be Section 179 recapture based on one or both of the following.

1.  Trading a vehicle that weighs more than 6,000 pounds for one that weighs less because the lighter one only qualifies for a much lower maximum Section 179 deduction.  That on its own would not trigger a recapture unless the new vehicle were to be used less than 50% for business.  What would happen is the zero rollover basis from the old SUV would leave very little to nothing available for future 179 or depreciation on the new one.

2.  Trading a vehicle that weighs more than 6,000 pounds for one that weighs less because they are not considered to be like kind for full Section 1031 deferred gain treatment.  This is also not true.  Vehicles less then and over 6,000 pounds are considered to be like kind by IRS.  Whoever told you otherwise was wrong.

However, from the figures you provided, there will be approximately $10,000 of Sec. 179 recapture because you are failing to meet the equal or higher cost requirement for your trade.  You are essentially selling your old SUV for $32,000 ($24,000 loan payoff + $8,000 equity) and reinvesting only $22,000.  The remaining $10,000 of unreinvested proceeds will be taxable as Section 179 recapture.  Looked at in a slightly different way, with the exact same results, your $24,000 relief of debt is $10,000 lower than the new debt you are taking on, triggering a taxable recapture.

I’m not sure how locked in you are to the $22,000 SUV.  While I am not an advocate of spending money just to increase deductions, it is a fact that many people in this situation would seriously consider buying a new vehicle that costs at least $32,000 so that there would be no taxable recapture to worry about.  You should have your personal tax advisor crunch some numbers to estimate how much Federal + State tax that $10,000 recapture will probably cost you.  The actual taxes will be based on your expected tax brackets.
 
I hope this helps.  Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Reader:

Hi Kerry,
Thank you so much!  I really appreciate your time to answer my question.  I feel a bit better-though disappointed I can’t get the car I want.  To funny-
considering I’m going from a Volvo to a Honda element.  So basically I have to choose a car that costs more.  Who would’ve thought.  Anyway, I forwarded your info on to my accountant and will have him run numbers for me so I make the best decision.  One thing I did consider was buying 2 of the elements, but I’ll talk to my accountant about that.  Thank you again and have a cool summer!
 
Sincerely,

KMK:

Fully tax free exchanges have always required acquiring replacement property costing at least as much as the net sales price of the old one.

There is no requirement to go from one vehicle to one.  You can exchange into multiple ones.  However, you have to be careful that each of the replacements is used more than 50% for business or else it will trigger some Sec. 179 recapture.

Good luck.

Kerry

Reader:

Kerry,
Do you do taxes for people in Maryland? 
 
Sincerely,

KMK:

I wish I could help; but I already have too many clients to take care of properly; so we are still trimming back on the difficult clients and are not accepting any new ones at this time. 

Unfortunately, we don’t have anyone to whom we could refer you. If you haven’t already done so, you should check out my tips on how to select the right tax preparer for you.

I wish I could be of more assistance; but I wish you the best of luck.  

Kerry Kerstetter


Reader:

Thank you Kerry,
And I will be sure and save you in the favorites!
 
 Sincerely,

 

Posted in 1031, 179 | Comments Off on SUV Trades & Sec 179 Recapture

Jersey Tax Machine

Posted by taxguru on August 3, 2006


Also approved for use in the PRC.



(Click image for full size pic)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Jersey Tax Machine

School for IRS employees?

Posted by taxguru on August 3, 2006



Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on School for IRS employees?

Posted by taxguru on August 3, 2006

The estate-tax total-repeal movement ain’t what it used to be. – The gut-less and worthless RINOs strike again and continue the morphing of the GOP into just another branch of the DemonRats when they can’t even muster enough votes to repeal a plank of the Communist Manifesto.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Retroactive Exchange?

Posted by taxguru on August 3, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: Exchange Question
 
Do you know whether a 1031 exchange can be made retroactively,  assuming both parties agree?  I have searched and cannot find 
anything specific to this issue.  It appears as though it is likely  to be ok, as long as the relinquishment of property has not yet occured.
 
Thanks,

My Reply:

You need to be a little more specific with the situation you are trying to describe.

If a property was already sold and the seller received the proceeds, then it is impossible to go back and change that transaction to a 1031 exchange.

If the disposal transaction is still in escrow and title hasn’t passed yet, the deal can be converted into a 1031 exchange.

Let me know if neither of those situations cover what you are faced with.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

Kerry,
 
Thank you for the quick reply.  The property has not bee sold and is  not in escrow currently.  Basically my company and the seller would 
like to back date (for lack of a better explanation) the transaction,  as if the 1031 took place earlier this year.  I’m not aware of any  other details.  It sounds to me like this is reasonable, as long as  both parties agree to “backdating” within the requirements of 1031 &  reg 1.1031(k)-1(b).

A:

You obviously must have some reason for wanting to do this. However, pretending that a transaction took place before it actually did sounds too much like fraud to me to be able to accept it as proper.  Just because both parties agree to it doesn’t make it any more legitimate. I can’t see the IRS ever accepting this as valid either.

You would be best to do the swap now and use the current date.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on Retroactive Exchange?

Posted by taxguru on August 2, 2006

Getting the Right Info Out of a Franchise Seller – And if you don’t have an accounting pro look over the books before buying a business, you’re nuts.  I have long advised including in any business purchase contract an escape clause that says “subject to approval by buyer’s legal and financial advisors.”  Frequently, before spending any time analyzing a company’s books, I just ask my clients if they are still interested in buying it. Rather than waste any more time crunching numbers, I just advise the clients to tell the seller that I do not approve the purchase.  The escape clause doesn’t specify any particular reasons the buyer’s advisors must have for nixing a deal, so buyer remorse is a valid enough reason for me to okay them backing out.  

 

Phone tax refund proving difficult to get from IRS – This is surprising to whom?  As if anything could be simple with IRS.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Another Basic Investment Tip

Posted by taxguru on August 2, 2006



Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Another Basic Investment Tip