Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 327,303 hits
  • Posts By Day

    October 2006
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for October, 2006

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2006

10 mistakes that made flipping a flop – Learning from other persons’ mistakes is a much better way to learn what not to do than making them yourself/. This guy’s venture into get rich quick real estate investing is a textbook case in how to really screw things up. 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on October 24, 2006

Find what your mutual fund fees really are – They’re as sneaky as our rulers in DC are at hiding the true costs.

 

Figuring IRA Withdrawals When Your Beneficiary Dies, and Essential IRA Records – From Gail Buckner

 

Corporations vs. LLCs – From Nolo

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Confusion Over Section 179

Posted by taxguru on October 20, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: quick question 

 Kerry,

Hi there- it was great to find your site.   I have a quick question on the Section 179 deduction – and please forgive my lack of expertise in the tax law: say you spend $100K on equipment – does that mean that you totally deduct that amount, saving ~$40K (assuming 40% tax rate?).  Does the ~$400K limit mean that you can save only up to approximately 40%*$400K = $160K in taxes?  How do you quantify what you spend on all Section 179 eligible items  – just adding them up?  It seems weird to me that the fed would actually penalize a company for making >$400K in capital expenditures that would fit the Section 179 law.

Also, can you claim this tax on money spent on upkeep and maintenance on equipment?

Thanks for listening~

A:

While using a taxpayer’s tax bracket percentage as a guide can give you a quick & dirty idea of the tax savings from a deduction, such as Section 179, the actual savings will be different because of the sneaky way in which taxes are actually calculated, such as using AGI as a trigger to reduce or eliminate several tax credits and deductions.  Any item that reduces AGI will have more of a tax saving impact than just the tax rate percentage.

You are misinterpreting the $400,000 issue ($430,000 for 2006).  What the tax code does is phase out and eliminate the Section 179 deduction for any taxpayer that has acquired a huge amount of new qualifying business equipment.  This is intended to eliminate this tax break for what our rulers consider un-deserving “evil big businesses” and focus this special deduction on smaller companies.  However, any company acquiring that much new stuff will still be claiming a substantial normal depreciation deduction, especially if it chooses to use an accelerated method of calculating it.

In regard to qualifying the amount spent on new qualifying equipment, any business that intends to do so must have a good set of accounting records and can run reports of the new items posted to the equipment fixed asset accounts. 

Costs posted to expense accounts, such as repairs and maintenance don’t qualify for the Section 179.  However, since you are already deducting those costs as normal operating expenses, it ends up working out better that way.

I hope this helps you better understand this issue.  If you personally are involved in running a business that may be considering utilizing it, you should be working directly with a professional tax advisor who will be able to better illustrate how it will affect your unique situation.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

<a href="about:Banner HPage_468x60

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Confusion Over Section 179

First & only date?

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on First & only date?

Repurchasing Residence?

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: tax exclusion
 
Dear Sir;
 
I am retiring in the Spring and will be moving my legal residence from a condo in Alexandria to our summer home in Michigan.  If I sell the condo I can exercise the $250K cap gains exclusion to cover the $200K cap gains which I expect when I sell the condo.  However I would like to keep the condo, because our children and their families live in the DC area and use it for a winter home.  Can I claim the exclusion if  sell the house to an obliging entity and repurchase it after a week or so (for the same price)??  I realize that I may incur expenses such as transfer fees, etc.  The advantage to me is that after a few years I may sell the condo and move  into a seniors complex.
 
Thank you for your help,

 
A:

 I am not aware of any restriction on repurchasing a residence on which you had claimed the exclusion.  However, doing so as quickly as you intend may open you up for some problems with IRS.  An ironic aspect to the tax laws in this country is the fact that while many of them are clearly intended to motivate behavior, if IRS suspects that the only reason you do something is for the tax benefits, they have the power to nullify it. 

How long to wait before repurchasing the home and avoid IRS accusations of tax motivated behavior is a judgment call that you should discuss with your own personal professional tax advisor.  As background info, a similar situation is with what are called “wash sales” where stocks are sold at a loss and then repurchased.  The tax code has a specific time frame of 30 days before and after the loss sale in which a reacquisition nullifies the ability to deduct the loss. 

The home sale isn’t to trigger deductible losses but is obviously being done so you can start the two year clock for the sale of your new home since only one tax free exclusion can be claimed within a two year period.  Whether an aggressive IRS auditor would try to toss out the tax free exclusion on the first home sale is impossible to predict; but is going to be harder to defend, the less time there is between sale and repurchase.

If the two year clock angle isn’t your motivation for wanting to sell and repurchase the home, you should discuss with your tax advisor holding onto the Alexandria condo and selling it within three years of your moving out.

As additional info to consider, besides the transfer and other related closing costs on the sale and repurchase, you are likely to trigger a reassessment in the home’s property tax valuation, bumping those up.

I obviously don’t have enough info to be able to definitively say whether your plan makes sense or not; but your personal tax advisor should be able to better help you with that thought process.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 
Follow-Up:

 Kerry,

Thank you very much for you prompt answer to my question, and since sale/repurchase is not clearly restricted I will pursue it further. As you well know, I must, by law, move my residency to Michigan when I live there most of the year, as will be the case after full retirement..  I have already been investigated by Michigan IRS about not paying MI Income tax and found to be in compliance, since I could show I had worked and lived in VA for more than half of each year.  This was triggered by two addresses and my wife’s residence which is MI, where she lives for 8 month of the year, votes, banks and pays income tax.

The “two year clock angle” is not my motivation.  We will probably keep our home on Lake Superior until we have one foot, maybe both, in the grave. So your suggestion about selling the Alexandria home in three years is an interesting angle, thanks.  However we will probably like to winter in Alexandria area for some time, since both our children (with families) live in the DC area and our son uses the condo often since it is 5 miles from his work whereas his home is 40 miles from work.

Thank you very much for your response,

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Repurchasing Residence?

Clients expect a lot from us.

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Clients expect a lot from us.

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006

Using Retirement Money Now On a Vacation Home Can Pay Off

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Tax Cuts Are Effective

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tax Cuts Are Effective

1031 Carryover Calculations

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: Exchange Question

How do I determine the basis of the new property with consideration of both properties being mortgaged?  (Increase in net or decrease in net)

 Is there a gain realized if the property’s FMV I am receiving is less than that of the property I disposed of?

 Thanks,

A:

When you prepare the 8824 to report the exchange to IRS, it will end up with the basis of the new replacement property.  The 8824 is a complicated and convoluted schedule; so most tax prep software programs have worksheets to assist in putting the right figures in the right place, including the amounts of debt on both the original and replacement properties. 

Some other programs also have handy 1031 worksheets, such as the TaxTools program from CFS.  There are links to both the 8824 and a separate worksheet here.

Depending on the amount of exchange expenses incurred in the deal, it possible that trading down may or may not result in a currently taxable gain on the exchange. The 8824 and worksheets will give that result.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on 1031 Carryover Calculations

Do liberals learn from their mistakes?

Posted by taxguru on October 18, 2006


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Do liberals learn from their mistakes?