
Archive for August, 2007
The Left’s answer for everything…
Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007

Posted in comix, Commies | Comments Off on The Left’s answer for everything…
Increasing Section 179 Deductions
Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007
Q-1:
Subject: 179 SUV deductionHi Kerry,I’ve been to your web site and blog, thank you for making the information on 179 deductions so easy to understand.I am a consultant with three sources of income for 2007: self-employment, partnership income under an LLC, and W-2 income.Last year I took a 179 SUV deduction on a toyota land cruiser of 25,000.My question for you:I’d like to find a way to take that nice deduction again in 2007. Can I sell the truck I bought in 2006, then buy another one in 2007 and take the deduction again?Also, will I face recapturing of depreciation for doing that?lets say this is the scenario:Paid 28k for the truck on 2006Sell the truck in 2007 for 29k (toyota land cruisers can appreciate)Will I owe recaptured depreciation?29k-28k+25k(the deduction taken in 2007)?Are you able to advise me on federal taxes. I am in Florida.Thanks!
A-1:
I’m just going to do a quickie refresher on this topic because I have covered it in more depth in numerous previous blog posts.
Basically, if you sell your current vehicle, you will have a taxable gain, which will be whatever your sales price is less the adjusted cost basis of the SUV (cost minus Section 179 and depreciation). You can go out and buy a new one and claim a new $25,000 Section 179 on your 2007 tax return; but that will be less than the taxable gain from the sale.
A more tax-savvy maneuver would be to trade in the old SUV on a new one. There is no taxable gain; but you can only claim a new Section 179 on the additional cost of the new vehicle after the trade-in allowance you are given.
If I’m not mistaken, a Toyota Land Cruiser is an SUV and not a truck; so it has a lower maximum Section 179 than a truck would have.
Remember also that business vehicles are just one type of asset that qualifies for the Section 179 expensing deduction. You can buy other kinds of business equipment and deduct their costs without having to sell your existing SUV.
This is a very basic tax matter and illustrates how dangerous it is for you to continue to try to run your business and tax matters without the assistance of an experienced professional tax advisor. You should start working with a tax pro ASAP. You may even want to give potential tax pros this issue and see how they address it before making your selection.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Q-2:
Thanks KerryI’ll seek out a tax professional.Can I buy antique office furniture for my office and expense that under 179?
A-2:
As long as you actually use the furniture in your business and not just as an investment, it should qualify for Section 179 expensing. I have a lot of info on what kinds of assets do and do not qualify for Section 179 on my website.
You should always remember that, if you expense the cost of the furniture, its cost basis for you will then be zero. Any sale of those items will then create a taxable gain for the full amount of the sales price. Likewise, if you give the furniture to someone else, that person will assume your same zero cost basis.
These are all issues that should be handled along with a professional tax advisor.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Follow-Up:
Great Thanks!Wish you were taking on more clients.
Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Increasing Section 179 Deductions
Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007
Man Pays Big Tax Bill in Coins, $1 Bills – Interesting way to make a statement about taxes.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Should tax advisor be in same state?
Posted by taxguru on August 12, 2007
Q-1:
Subject: Illinois CPA Recommendation?
Would you happen to know a good Tax Advisor in Chicago, IL.
I am starting my new business and would like to start in the right foot.
I appreciate your feedback,
Thanks
A-1:
The only names I have are on this page.
As I say in my tips for selecting tax advisors, geographic location shouldn’t be the main basis for selection. Most good professionals have clients all over the country.I hope this helps. Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Q-2:
I believe your point of view on selecting the best Tax Advisor not necessary being close to client’s location. But I was thinking in the view that my business will operate in the State of Illinois. Wouldn’t I need a tax advisor in the state of Illinois for State Taxes?Also can you help me in your perspective about incorporating in Nevada? I heard many advantages incorporating in Nevada than in Delaware or Illinois. I would like to start on the best route for my start-up company. I am thinking about choosing C-Corp as my entity because of the tax deductions and tax bracket compare to LLC and S-Corps. Can you provide me with your insight on this?I am excited to start thinking as an Entrepreneur and not as an employee. There is a lot of benefits that an average employee does not have. I been reading and listening to audio books on RichDad by Robert Kiyosaki and as well as other Leadership and Tax benefits audio books. But mainly its my passion to service my clients in Computer Information Technology Services because that is what I do best.Thank you for your quick response to my first question
A-2:
While it would be nice to have someone intimately familiar with your state’s tax system by being located within the state, that’s not as critical as you think. Most tax pros routinely handle out of state tax issues. Back in my California CPA practice, I had a CPA on staff who we gave all non-California tax returns to do by hand. Now, the Lacerte tax software has added several state programs to its mix, so I use it to prepare several different state tax returns every month.
Since you are considering operating a Nevada corp, that brings up the issue of who would handle its taxes if being within the state is critical. Would you have one tax pro for your Illinois activities and a different one for your Nevada operations? While dividing the workload can sometimes make sense, you will generally find that working with one firm that can better appreciate the big picture will be more efficient.
I do have extensive experience with Nevada corps and have actually written about it several times on my blog and website; so I don’t have time to rehash everything here. That is another key issue you need to work on with your personal professional tax advisor.
I will warn you about the number one misconception I constantly encounter. Just establishing a corp in Nevada will do nothing to reduce your Illinois income taxes if you actually conduct your business operations inside the borders of Illinois. You will still need to file Illinois income tax returns and pay taxes to that state. Depending on how your business activities are handled, there may be ways in which to source the income to Nevada and legally avoid having any Illinois tax obligation. That is something that you need to work on with an experienced professional tax advisor because if you do it incorrectly, you could subject yourself to some serious penalties.
Good luck. I hope this helps.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in preparers | Comments Off on Should tax advisor be in same state?
Changing From C to S Corp
Posted by taxguru on August 12, 2007
Q:
Hello, Mr. Kerstetter,
I came across your website today. I was wondering if you can answer me a quick question:
Our fiscal year is April 1st to March 31st. What would be the time frame that we can change to an S corp?
Appreciate your help!
A:
You need to do some more research and work directly with an experienced professional tax advisor before you take the step of converting to an S corp.
As I have explained several times on both my blog and website, one of the biggest pitfalls to converting from a C corp to an S is the fact that you will also have to convert your fiscal year to a calendar year, which will force you to lose all of the benefits of having a different fiscal year.
You may find that retaining your current C corp and starting a new S corp will give you the best of both worlds. A good professional tax advisor should be able to explain how using two corps can work in your best interest.
I don’t know how much of my website you have looked at, but here are some key pages you should study before consulting with a professional tax advisor:
Comparing S and C corps
<a href="http://taxguru.org/corps/scorp.htm"Benefits of Different Fiscal Years
<a href="http://taxguru.org/corps/taxyear.htm"S Election Instructions From IRS
Good luck. I hope this helps.Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in corp | Comments Off on Changing From C to S Corp
Basic taxation philosophy…
Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2007
as explained by Dogbert

Posted in comix, politics, taxes | Comments Off on Basic taxation philosophy…
Valuing S Corps
Posted by taxguru on August 10, 2007
Q-1:
Subject: SUB S CORP SHARE VALUE
Dear Kerry;
I have spent an afternoon on the internet trying to get some general information about this subject, without success. Our family has a Sub S Corp trucking company which is now 5 years old and is doing quit well. Onginally we set my youngest son up as sole incorporator and he takes 100% of the Sub s schedule k-1 on his personal incme tax return. We would now like to sell some shares of stock (ownership) to my older son and daughter. How do we figure out the value per share to charge my older son. It is not so much to make money but what the accountant and the IRS will accept.
Thanks
A-1:
There are several different ways to value small businesses, each yielding very different results.
Rather than have a professional business appraiser give you all of those value, it is generally easier to decide, for your current needs, if you want a high or low value and then work with your professional tax advisor to draw up an analysis to justify that number. That will be a lot quicker and a lot less expensive for your needs.
Everyone involved needs to sit down and look at the short and long term aspects to whatever value you use. A high value will possibly generate a capital gain for your youngest son, depending on what his current adjusted cost basis is for the shares he will be selling. That will also give the new shareholder a higher cost basis to start with.
Conversely, a low share price will generate less capital gain, or possibly a capital loss for your youngest son, but will give the new shareholder a lower cost basis to start with.
Again, working with your professional tax advisor, you may want to start by calculating the break-even cost basis of your youngest son’s shares and then have your tax advisor back into a calculation method that would justify that value for the shares.
Good luck. I hope this gives you some ideas of issues to discuss among yourselves and with your professional tax advisor.
Kerry Kerstetter
Q-2:
Kerry:Thank you for the response. I would like to pay you for some consulting time to explore this issue further.First of all there was a typo, in that our trucking company has been in existence for just over 11 years. Second, the reason for the change in ownership is there is a pending divorce. He has a prenup dated 7/2/2000, excluding the companies value prior to that time.Our present accountant is a family friend and we wish to keep him out of the loop at this time. From the information you gave us it appears that a low share price would be desirable, but would it stand the scrunity in the divorce court. We intend to consult an attorney once we establish the price per share and the logic by which it is derived. Could we pay you to help us arrive at a reasonable price per share, along with the reasons used to get there? Could we provide you with our financial figures to give you something tangible to work with? I further suspect that upon the share price determination that the company Articles of incorporation along with the stock retirement agreement would have to be amended.Thanks
A-2:
There are far too many options to consider and possible scenarios that can be used to achieve your goals for me to even begin giving you specific advice via this medium.
You all will need to work directly with an experienced tax pro who can analyze your unique circumstances. I wish I could help; but I already have too many clients to take care of properly; so we are still trimming back on the difficult clients and are not accepting any new ones at this time.
Unfortunately, we don’t have anyone specific to whom we could refer you. I did recently post some names and links for some like-minded tax pros around the country.
If you haven’t already done so, you should check out my tips on how to select the right tax preparer for you.
I wish I could be of more assistance; and I wish you the best of luck.Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in corp | Comments Off on Valuing S Corps
Gifting Appreciated Assets
Posted by taxguru on August 10, 2007
Q:
Subject: Re: Gifts Tax Free For Recipients
Good morning, Kerry. I’m assuming the question had to do with cash gifts rather than of appreciated assets. I’ve seen some surprised people when the recipients of appreciated assets were told that they received the basis of the donor.In our charitable giving world, we tell people to, where possible, give cash to family and appreciated assets to charity.
A:
That particular email did have to do with cash; but you are correct in noting the carry-over basis aspect to non-cash gifts.
As I have discussed on a number of occasions, it is a bit more complicated than simply donating appreciated assets to charity. Another part of tax and gifting plans often involves deciding which family member has the lowest tax bracket and either gifting or holding those assets so that person can sell them with the lowest tax bite.
Thanks for writing.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Gifting | Comments Off on Gifting Appreciated Assets





