Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 333,959 hits
  • Posts By Day

    February 2009
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    232425262728  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for February, 2009

Closing Biz After Sec. 179

Posted by taxguru on February 14, 2009

Q:

Subject: section 179 question

If I have taken section 179 expense deduction in 2006 and 2007 and have had to close my business in 2008 will I have to claim these deductions from these years as income in 2008?

Another question if you could please give me advice.  I installed new carpet, laminate flooring and countertops/cabinets in my leased office in 2008 could these items be considered section 179 expenses or are they items that could be classfied as building repairs or would I have to depreciate them and over how many years?

Thanks,

 

A:

You need to be working with an experienced professional tax advisor to make sure you do things properly here.

Basically, if you claimed Section 179 for business equipment on previous tax returns, the adjusted cost basis of those assets is zero.  This means that anything you receive for them in a sale is going to be taxable gain; technically a recapture of the previously deducted Section 179.

If you just shut down the business and don’t sell off the assets, there will still be a smaller taxable recapture because their business usage has fallen below 50%.  Your personal professional tax advisor should have tax software that will calculate that recapture amount.

There are various ways in which your leasehold improvements can be expensed and/or depreciated.  Your personal professional tax advisor should be able to use the method most appropriate and beneficial for your unique situation.

I hope this helps.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Closing Biz After Sec. 179

Prorated Home Sale Exclusion

Posted by taxguru on February 14, 2009

Q:

Subject: Home Sale Gain Exclusion

Situation:
5 years ago, was laid off in Minnesota and had to settle for a California job.
Commuted every 2 weeks for 1 year then moved family to a rental.
Wife and children lived in MN home every time children not in school (about 3 months per year), nevertheless total days is well shy of 730.

Kept a car registered in MN, voted in MN, kept MN drivers licenses, bank account in MN while trying unsuccessfully to transition to a job back in Minnesota.  Even had several in-person interviews in MN over the years.

Finally gave up & sold in Minnesota; just closed.  We expected to exclude 50K of gain.

Can we
A) Exclude the gain because our beloved MN home was our primary residence defined by that we never bought anything else and always considered & treated it as “our home”.
B) Exclude the gain because the wife was always staying there… it may be shy of 730 days but there is no way to audit that.
C) Exclude the gain because I was forced to sell due to a job situation and we used it as a primary residence for 1 year, 50% of the 2 year standard, and all we need to exclude is $25K apiece.
D) SOL

Thanks!

 

A:

You need to be working with an experienced professional tax advisor to make sure you do things properly here.

It looks like you should be able to qualify for the prorated tax free exclusion based on your change in employment.  Since your gain is only 10% of the total possible Section l21 exclusion of $500,000, there shouldn’t be a problem in excluding the full amount of your profit.
However, your personal professional tax advisor will be better able to evaluate the details of your situation and decide if that is the case.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

 

Posted in 121 | Comments Off on Prorated Home Sale Exclusion

Refundable Tax Credits

Posted by taxguru on February 14, 2009

Q:

hey i was looking at your tax website and have a quick question…
 
hopefully you can give me a non-committal answer without alot of research.
 
have you ever heard of a situation where someone with no income can qualify for a tx refund, even though theyve paid nothing in?
 
for example an unwed mother living with her parents: she hasn’t worked, yet wouldnt she qualify for some type of credits taking care of a newborn? and if so, those credits applied to her tax liability, but no actual liability as there was no income, does that soemhow turn into a credit & subsequent refund?
 
any suggestions would be appreciated, even if its just steering us where to research further. Again, not looking for legal tax advice, I’ve just never heard of someone getting a tax refund without paying any taxes in through the year.

 

A:

While you are correct that most tax credits are non-refundable, meaning they can zero out the taxes, but not create an actual refund to tax return filers, there are an increasing number of actual refundable credits that allow people to receive money even if they hadn’t paid anything in.  The largest is the Earned Income Credit (EIC), often generating refunds  of thousands of dollars in “free” money for the filers.

If our new President gets his way, there will be even more of those kind  of credits, which some people are calling welfare.

Most of these credits don’t apply to people who are being claimed s dependents on someone else’s return, so your friend probably wouldn’t qualify for a refund if her parents are showing her and/or her child as dependents.  However, it wouldn’t hurt to have a professional tax advisor look at her particular situation to see if filing a 1040 makes sense.

I hope this helps.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

TaxCoach Software: Are you giving your clients what they really want?

 

Posted in Credits | Comments Off on Refundable Tax Credits

Selecting a cabinet…

Posted by taxguru on February 13, 2009

From Jay Leno via NewsMax:

Just a few days after being nominated, New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg withdrew as the nominee for commerce secretary. In a statement explaining why he turned it down, he cited “irresolvable conflicts.” So apparently he must have paid his taxes. He just wouldn’t fit in.

Posted in comix, Crooks, humor, Obambi | Comments Off on Selecting a cabinet…

Rare sightings…

Posted by taxguru on February 12, 2009

Posted in comix, Crooks, Dims | Comments Off on Rare sightings…

Posted by taxguru on February 12, 2009

From Jay Leno via NewsMax:

Prosecutors have asked a federal judge to send former Washington, D.C., mayor Marion Barry to jail for failing to file tax returns for eighth time in nine years. He hasn’t paid taxes for eight years straight. So it’s either jail or a Cabinet position in the Obama administration. Take your pick.

Posted in Crooks, Dims, humor | Comments Off on

Fonzie Scheme?

Posted by taxguru on February 12, 2009

Posted in comix, scams | Comments Off on Fonzie Scheme?

Posted by taxguru on February 11, 2009


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in comix, IRS | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 11, 2009

Posted in audits, comix | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on February 10, 2009

Posted in comix, Crooks, Dims | Comments Off on