Q:

Subject: tax website

I saw your tax web site, and was wondering if you could help me.

 

Simply, the IRS disalowed my EIC, ( never recieved it, (( refund froze )),  later after i protested, they reassessed their own review and sent me a letter stating that i have to pay them the EIC amount in question, if i disagree, then i have to go to tax court. If i go to tax court, then i will have to pay penalties and interest on an amount that i never recieved.

 

Is their any service that you can offer me to fix this ?

Have you seen anything like this before?

A:

There are far too many variables involved for me to be able to advise on your particular situation via this medium. 

The person who prepared your tax return should be able to help you with this.  If you did your own return, you learned an expensive lesson.

To work out the best solution for your particular circumstances, you really need to work with a tax pro who can help you set up a strategy that will work for you.

I wish I could help you; but I already have too many clients to take care of; so we are not accepting any new ones at this time.

Unfortunately, we don’t have anyone else to whom we could refer you. If you haven’t already done so, you should check out my tips on how to select the right tax preparer for you.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

(Click on image for full size)

(Click on image for full size)

Investment Interest Deduction Remains Alive and Well  – This is one of the many parts of a tax return that I would never try to do without a computer.  Even then, there is no guarantee it’s done properly.  I have seen Form 4952 computed all sorts of different ways by different software programs, both professional and consumer ones. 

Readers Fume Over Forced Upgrades – Not happy about Intuit’s sunset policy for Quicken and QuickBooks.

IRS Finds Charities Overstep Into Politics

IRS Releases New Guidance and Results of Political Intervention Examinations

FTB immune from liability for tax collection activities

(Click on image for full size)

Q:

Subject: Unfair state tax structure for partial year residents

 

Unlike most states that I have lived at, Arkansas computes state income tax for partial year residents by adding both total year income and total Federal taxes paid in their calculations.  By doing this, it automatically raises the percent of tax because Federal taxes are higher.  This penalizes the part year residents because they pay a higher percent than full- year residents.  This doesn’t seem fair or legal.

Example:  I made $28,000 in Mississippi and paid $500 in state taxes (after my refund).  I made $17,000 in Arkansas and paid $875 and they want another $500!

Does that seem fair or legal to you?

I realize you may not want to answer that without a fee, but I was hoping to get advice from someone who had knowledge.

Thanks,

A:

While I don’t prepare any tax returns by hand, I do prepare several partial year and nonresident Arkansas tax returns each year with my Lacerte software.  Your description of how it’s done didn’t sound right; so I just reviewed the actual 2005 AR1000NR form. 

You are misinterpreting how the Arkansas state income tax form works.  It doesn’t add in Federal income taxes to the taxable income; although I have seen this on some other state tax forms. 

The Arkansas tax is calculated for nonresidents with the same tax rate schedule as for full year residents.  The twist comes in with the apportioning of the total tax based on the percentage of taxable income from inside Arkansas to all income.

While your claim that Arkansas is unfair to nonresidents isn’t correct in the context which you intended, I have seen plenty of cases in other states around the country where that is the case, especially California.  Some of the most outrageous examples are taxes on rental cars and hotel rooms, which are aimed at tourists from outside the state. 

How they can justify this is easy to explain.  Nonresidents can’t vote; so the rulers in those states have nothing to worry about in regard to punishment for screwing over those people.  In fact, they can sell the idea to their in-state constituents that the more money they are able to squeeze from out of towners, the lower the tax burden is on the full year residents.

In regard to your multi-state income tax returns, you really should be working with a qualified tax pro who can ensure that each state’s apportionment is calculated properly and that you are receiving the proper Other State tax credit on your home state tax return.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

Thanks for your help.  I certainly appreciate it.

Atlanta Man Helped Customers Falsely Claim They Are Exempt from Federal Taxes as Members of Purported Native American Tribe

Q:

Subject: quicken

wonder if you could help me with something.  I am using quicken 2006 professional and my calendar is using february 26 and it is the 18th?  how do I change this date to reflect it using the present date?

 

thanks for any help you can offer …it is also posting transactions on the 26th so this means to me some how the calendar think it is another day?

A:

My guess is it’s one of two things causing this.

1.  Your computer’s date is off and needs to be corrected.

2.  You have the box in the Options checked to “Complete Fields Using Previous Entries.”   If your previous entry was dated 2/26/06, all future entries will start with that date, until you manually change it.  Then, that new date will become the default setting for future entries until it is manually changed again.

Remember that even if you accidentally enter the wrong date, you can always go back in and correct it.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

thans Kerry..you were right..doh!!!

thanks