Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 341,609 hits
  • Posts By Day

    May 2026
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Posted by taxguru on December 2, 2004

No Change in IRS Interest Rates for the First Quarter of 2005 – Will remain at 5.0% for at least three more months.

 

 IRS Considering Mandatory E-Filing for Business Returns Not a good idea.  As I’ve mentioned on countless occasions, electronic filing does not allow attachment of additional explanatory info to prevent unnecessary audits. 

 

Charities React to New Vehicle Donation Rules I have been hearing a lot of these commercials lately, encouraging people to donate vehicles before the end of the year in order to receive a higher deduction than will be possible starting in 2005. It’s basically an invitation for people to cheat on their deductions.  I don’t intend to encourage any more excessive scrutiny by IRS; but this is almost a no-brainer for an opportunity on their part to check on inflated values being assigned to donated vehicles. 

 

Avoid Common 401(k) Investing Mistakes

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on December 1, 2004

The Feds Bust Another Tax Evasion Scam; This Time In Louisiana

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Corp Reference Materials

Posted by taxguru on December 1, 2004

Q:

Hi Kerry,
I just read your articles on corporations on your website and wanted to let you know how useful they have been.  I am a beginning real estate investor, residing  in California and in the process of aquiring some property in the PHX,AZ area.  I formed a California C-corp for my investments and was wondering what books/products you recommend for doing all my corporation minutes, bylaws….etc.  I would like set my fiscal year to be on Jan. 31.  I’ve been skimming the Nolo Press website about their Setting Corp info but seems like their products seem to be biased towards S-corp.  As a matter of fact, I’ve scored all through the internet and the taxguru website was practically the only site that mentioned the positives of forming a C-Corp.  All the others went into great details on why its beneficial to form LLC and/or S-Corps.  I am wondering if you take on clients that are out of state(like CA) and if you could recommend any books/sites for what I need to do next as getting my C-corp all “legit”
 
Thanks,

A:

I have long been a big fan of the books and other materials from Nolo Press, as well as Corporate Publishing Co.  

The distinction between S and C corps really only affects taxation of the corp income.  All of the other rules and requirements for maintaining a corporation (minutes, officers, stock, etc) are exactly the same; so there aren’t separate books on these topics for C and S corps.

We do already have clients in almost every state of the country.  Unfortunately, I am so far behind with just their work that I am unable to accept any new clients from anywhere.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Corp Reference Materials

Posted by taxguru on December 1, 2004

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on December 1, 2004

GOP Discusses National Sales Tax

 

Company’s perk: $5,000 to buy clean car – And that $5,000 will have to be added to the employees’ W-2 income.

 

Why you can’t trust Congress – I’ve long though that voting on legislation that they haven’t even read should be grounds for impeachment.

Greenspan is the man to reform Social Security According to George Will.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Responding To Tax Protestors

Posted by taxguru on November 30, 2004

Over the past 25 plus years, I have studied, analyzed and debunked literally hundreds of tax protestors and their ridiculous arguments for why nobody has to pay taxes in this country. For a long time, I felt as if I was doing the IRS’s job because their strategy was to just ignore the idiots and hope they would just go away. As I constantly explained, the IRS’s silence on these matters just lent perceived credibility to their insane arguments. As I’ve been chronicling, IRS has finally taken a more proactive approach to dealing with tax protestor scammers.

I am still waiting to hear back from Kenny Lizotte as to the IRS book that officially says that nobody has to pay taxes. He was so positive about that in his drunken messages on our answering machine. Of course, no such book exists; so we will never learn that secret from him. He has resorted to a long running tactic used by people in the tax protestor movement; trying to indict us professional tax practitioners as active participants in the massive taxation conspiracy in this country. The list of questions he sent was tiny compared to the ones I have seen in the past, which were often three pages long, single-spaced.

I have no intention of wasting time responding to idiots like Mr. Lizotte. However, I was copied on the following email that a reader sent to Mr. Lizotte. I haven’t checked all of the code section citations; but they sound reasonable. However, the name of the sender does seem a bit strange.


From: “D Shyster” shyster1040@hotmail.com

To: kennylizotte@msn.com

Subject: Re: Tax Questions

Kenny:

In reference to your questions to Kerry Kerstetter (posted on http://www.taxguru.net)/ of November 28, 2004, try this on for size:

Section 1 imposes a tax on your “taxable income” which, under Section 63, is the “gross income” under Section 61 less the deductions allowed; thus there is a tax imposed based on your “taxable income”

Section 6012 requires you to file a tax return if you had gross income in an amount greater than the sum of the basic standard deduction and the exemption amount – probably about $10,000 right now, give or take; thus, if you earned more than $10,000 (or whatever the basic standard deduction and the exemption amount add up to), you have to file a tax return, and that return must show the tax calculated under Section 1.

Section 6151 requires you to pay the tax shown on a return if you were required to file that return.

Therefore, the following results: If you had gross income above $10,000 (or whatever the current basic standard deduction plus the exemption amount is) then you must file a tax return showing the tax calculated under section 1; because you have to file a tax return, you must pay the tax shown on that return.

I believe that the foregoing shows:

(1) what code section requires average Americans to pay the income tax – Section 6151 does;

(2) what code section shows the liability of the average American for the income tax – same as before, Section 6151 obligates you to pay the tax shown on your return;

(3) What code section requires Americans to keep books and records – Section 6001 permits the IRS to issue regulations requiring anyone liable for any tax to keep records – which they’ve done – see Treasury Regulations 1.6001-1 and following (and which will apply to you if you meet the test under Section 6151 because then you’ll owe taxes, which means you’ll be liable for them);

(4) What code section requires Americans to make a return – Section 6012 does; and

(5) What code section requires the average American to submit to withholding – short answer – Sections 3401 to 3406 do. Long answer – nothing directly; however, Section 6654 does require you to make estimated tax payments on a quarterly basis (i.e., every three months) prior to the date for filing your return – i.e., it’s a pay-as-you-go system, and Section 3401 and following requires your employer to withhold from your wages amounts that approximate the taxes you’ll ultimately owe on that income, and also gives your employer complete protection from you if you try to sue the employer to get them back. So, the effective answer really is – Sections 3401-3406 do.

Does that do it?

BTW, yes, every little red cent you got for doing work, e.g., wages, or for lending out your money, is included in the term “gross income” – section 861 does not “determine” anything, not your taxable income from sources within the US, nor even whether or not a given activity was a “source” of income – all that 861 does is assign a geographic location to your sources of income – it tells you whether or not a source was in the US or outside the US, it does not tell you whether or not the activity was a source at all. Further, the 16th Amendment was properly ratified and it is therefore part of the Constitution. Even further, Congress has almost unfettered power to tax things – the taxing power is included in the general list of Congress’ powers and is therefore of equal dignity with all the rest. That means that it is an independent source of power, and is not limited by the other sources – meaning that Congress can tax purely intrastate income even though it cannot regulate purely intrastate activity that generates that income.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Responding To Tax Protestors

Posted by taxguru on November 30, 2004

Tax writers Want GAO Review of OICs

 

Former Treasury Officials Slam National Retail Sales Tax, Praise VAT – Great idea.  Let’s emulate the Europeans because we all know that they have all the answers for designing a perfect society.  How stupid an idea is that?  Let’s add an entirely new taxation system to learn and keep track of, rather than just use one we are all already familiar with, such as sales tax.

 

IRS Officials Urge Care for Those Making a Car Donation; New Law Changes Rules at End of the Year

 

Hartford Goes to Court in Effort to Block EITC Test – There’s just something satisfying about local governments having to battle with IRS just as we peons have to every day.

 

IRS Simplifies FUTA Tax Deposit Rules for Small Businesses  – Not a huge break, but we need to be grateful for whatever tiny reduction in red tape we are given by our masters.    

 

ABA Tax Section Asks Congress to Repeal or Modify AMT – This pretty much sums it up:

…alternative minimum tax no longer serves the purpose for which it was originally intended and asked that it be repealed or modified to be more in line with its original purpose of applying to high-income taxpayers.

Let’s not forget to support ReformAMT

 

Time to save Social Security

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on November 30, 2004

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on November 30, 2004

Tax activist faces charges – More on Joe Banister.

Pursue Happiness, Vote GOP. The real reason Republicans win. – Good summary of the DemonRat philosophy, including:

  • That taxes must always be higher, never lower, because in the words of one traditional Democrat “I want the government to have the money.”
  • That you should not be allowed to invest some of your Social Security taxes in a personally owned account that will grow over your lifetime and give you some asset ownership upon your retirement, because it is a bad thing for you to have such assets.

On Social Security, Bush tested. Reform allies want him engaged.

New Social Security Plan Allows Workers To Put Portion Of Earnings On Favorite Team – From The Onion

The IRS Chain Gang – Similar to the “Tax Freedom Day” concept. We spend a large portion of our time working just in order to feed the government coffers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on November 30, 2004

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on