Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 343,850 hits
  • Posts By Day

    May 2026
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Why AARP is so opposed to Social Security Reform…

Posted by taxguru on August 18, 2007

Posted in comix, SSA | Comments Off on Why AARP is so opposed to Social Security Reform…

Posted by taxguru on August 17, 2007

Fair Tax, Foul Politics – Surprisingly strong opposition to the FairTax proposal by the editors of National Review, who believe it to be political suicide for any candidate supporting it. I think they are overstating the country’s love for the IRS; but this is a good example of how impossible it is to make a radical change in the tax system with no majority supporting any alternative. We are doomed to eternal tinkering with the current system, guaranteeing an unending amount of work for us tax pros.

[Update: Feedback on this editorial]

Posted in FairTax | Comments Off on

3 Scariest Words?

Posted by taxguru on August 16, 2007


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in comix, IRS | Comments Off on 3 Scariest Words?

Bad experiences with tax preparers?

Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007

I am scheduled to have a phone interview tomorrow with a writer for SmartMoney on the subject of being smarter about looking for tax pros, which is obviously a topic I have long been very vocal about.

The writer is also interested in hearing from others on this topic.  Specifically:

Also, I’m looking to talk to some people who have been dissatisfied with a tax preparer’s service (including but not limited to CPAs, enrolled agents, joe shmoes, & storefronts). Can you think of anyone I might get in touch with, or would you be willing to post a query on your blog?
 

When we talk tomorrow, I plan on giving her some examples of tax preparer screw-ups I have seen.  When we first relocated here from the SF Bay Area, it was like shooting fish in a barrel, correcting huge expensive mistakes that other preparers had made and recovering hundreds of thousands of dollars for people.

Anyone else – tax pros, as well as clients – who would like to contribute to this article by sharing their bad experiences getting their taxes done should contact Janet Paskin via email at jpaskin@hearst.com

 


Posted in preparers | Comments Off on Bad experiences with tax preparers?

Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007

Posted in audits, comix | Comments Off on

The Left’s answer for everything…

Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007

Posted in comix, Commies | Comments Off on The Left’s answer for everything…

Increasing Section 179 Deductions

Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007

Q-1:

Subject: 179 SUV deduction

 

Hi Kerry,

 

I’ve been to your web site and blog, thank you for making the information on 179 deductions so easy to understand.

 

I am a consultant with three sources of income for 2007: self-employment, partnership income under an LLC, and W-2 income.

 

Last year I took a 179 SUV deduction on a toyota land cruiser of 25,000.

 

My question for you:

I’d like to find a way to take that nice deduction again in 2007. Can I sell the truck I bought in 2006, then buy another one in 2007 and take the deduction again? 

 

Also, will I face recapturing of depreciation for doing that?

 

lets say this is the scenario:

Paid 28k for the truck on 2006

Sell the truck in 2007 for 29k (toyota land cruisers can appreciate)

Will I owe recaptured depreciation?

29k-28k+25k(the deduction taken in 2007)?

 

Are you able to advise me on federal taxes.  I am in Florida.

 

Thanks!

A-1:

I’m just going to do a quickie refresher on this topic because I have covered it in more depth in numerous previous blog posts.

Basically, if you sell your current vehicle, you will have a taxable gain, which will be whatever your sales price is less the adjusted cost basis of the SUV (cost minus Section 179 and depreciation).  You can go out and buy a new one and claim a new $25,000 Section 179 on your 2007 tax return; but that will be less than the taxable gain from the sale.

A more tax-savvy maneuver would be to trade in the old SUV on a new one.  There is no taxable gain; but you can only claim a new Section 179 on the additional cost of the new vehicle after the trade-in allowance you are given.

If I’m not mistaken, a Toyota Land Cruiser is an SUV and not a truck; so it has a lower maximum Section 179 than a truck would have.

Remember also that business vehicles are just one type of asset that qualifies for the Section 179 expensing deduction.  You can buy other kinds of business equipment and deduct their costs without having to sell your existing SUV.

This is a very basic tax matter and illustrates how dangerous it is for you to continue to try to run your business and tax matters without the assistance of an experienced professional tax advisor.   You should start working with a tax pro ASAP.  You may even want to give potential tax pros this issue and see how they address it before making your selection.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Q-2:

Thanks Kerry

 

I’ll seek out a tax professional.

 

Can I buy antique office furniture for my office and expense that under 179?

A-2:

As long as you actually use the furniture in your business and not just as an investment, it should qualify for Section 179 expensing.  I have a lot of info on what kinds of assets do and do not qualify for Section 179 on my website

You should always remember that, if you expense the cost of the furniture, its cost basis for you will then be zero.  Any sale of those items will then create a taxable gain for the full amount of the sales price.  Likewise, if you give the furniture to someone else, that person will assume your same zero cost basis. 

These are all issues that should be handled along with a professional tax advisor.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

Great Thanks!

 

Wish you were taking on more clients.

 

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Increasing Section 179 Deductions

Posted by taxguru on August 15, 2007

Man Pays Big Tax Bill in Coins, $1 Bills – Interesting way to make a statement about taxes.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

New monster movie?

Posted by taxguru on August 13, 2007

Posted in comix, IRS | Comments Off on New monster movie?

Should tax advisor be in same state?

Posted by taxguru on August 12, 2007

Q-1:

Subject: Illinois CPA Recommendation?

Would you happen to know a good Tax Advisor in Chicago, IL.
I am starting my new business and would like to start in the right foot.
I appreciate your feedback,
Thanks

A-1:

The only names I have are on this page.

As I say in my tips for selecting tax advisors, geographic location shouldn’t be the main basis for selection.  Most good professionals have clients all over the country.

I hope this helps.  Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Q-2:

I believe your point of view on selecting the best Tax Advisor not necessary being close to client’s location. But I was thinking in the view that my business will operate in the State of Illinois. Wouldn’t I need a tax advisor in the state of Illinois for State Taxes?

 

Also can you help me in your perspective about incorporating in Nevada? I heard many advantages incorporating in Nevada than in Delaware or Illinois. I would like to start on the best route for my start-up company. I am thinking about choosing C-Corp as my entity because of the tax deductions and tax bracket compare to LLC and S-Corps. Can you provide me with your insight on this?

 

I am excited to start thinking as an Entrepreneur and not as an employee. There is a lot of benefits that an average employee does not have. I been reading and listening to audio books on RichDad by Robert Kiyosaki and as well as other Leadership and Tax benefits audio books. But mainly its my passion to service my clients in Computer Information Technology Services because that is what I do best.

Thank you for your quick response to my first question

A-2:

While it would be nice to have someone intimately familiar with your state’s tax system by being located within the state, that’s not as critical as you think. Most tax pros routinely handle out of state tax issues.  Back in my California CPA practice, I had a CPA on staff who we gave all non-California tax returns to do by  hand.  Now, the Lacerte tax software has added several state programs to its mix, so I use it to prepare several different state tax returns every month. 

Since you are considering operating a Nevada corp, that brings up the issue of who would handle its taxes if being within the state is critical.  Would you have one tax pro for your Illinois activities and a different one for your Nevada operations?  While dividing the workload can sometimes make sense, you will generally find that working with one firm that can better appreciate the big picture will be more efficient.

I do have extensive experience with Nevada corps and have actually written about it several times on my blog and website; so I don’t have time to rehash everything here.  That is another key issue you need to work on with your personal professional tax advisor.

I will warn you about the number one misconception I constantly encounter.  Just establishing a corp in Nevada will do nothing to reduce your Illinois income taxes if you actually conduct your business operations inside the borders of Illinois.  You will still need to file Illinois income tax returns and pay taxes to that state.  Depending on how your business activities are handled, there may be ways in which to source the income to Nevada and legally avoid having any Illinois tax obligation.  That is something that you need to work on with an experienced professional tax advisor because if you do it incorrectly, you could subject yourself to some serious penalties.

Good luck.  I hope this helps.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

TaxCoach Software: Are you giving your clients what they really want?

 

Posted in preparers | Comments Off on Should tax advisor be in same state?