
Dems’ Top Ingredient:
Posted by taxguru on February 2, 2007
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Dems’ Top Ingredient:
Section 179 Income Limit
Posted by taxguru on February 2, 2007
Q:
Subject: Section 179 – Please helpHello TaxGuru. I came across your website after searching google and I think my situation is similar to what you describe in the following link regarding sole proprietorships and taking the Section 179 deduction…
http://www.taxguru.net/2004/07/limits-on-section-179.html
I just wanted to briefly describe my situation and ask you if I am interpreting things correctly.
My wife started a photography business at the beginning of 2006. For the year, the business will have a net loss of about $16k due to photography equipment purchases. I wanted to deduct all of these business assets using Section 179. We are filing married-jointly and we both have W2 income which resulted in positive taxable income both before and after applying the section 179 deductions. Is this OK to do, or do I need to depreciate the assets?
Thank you for your help!
A:
You seem to be understanding the issue correctly. Your W-2 income can be used to determine how much Section 179 can be claimed on your wife’s Schedule C. The net loss, including the Sec. 179, on her C will shelter some of your W-2 income, most likely resulting in a larger refund of taxes withheld from your paychecks.
As I mentioned in that post, as well as in practically every other one, you should work with a professional tax advisor and not try to prepare your own tax returns. There are so many ways you could screw things up on your own that it would be extremely reckless on your part to do your own 1040. Practically any tax preparer should be able to save you much more in taxes than his/her fees; so you should end up with more money, in addition to the peace of mind that IRS and your State won’t be coming after you.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Section 179 Income Limit
Quicken and Multiple Files
Posted by taxguru on February 2, 2007
Q-1:
Subject: Multiple Quicken filesDear kerryI read your web site and blog with great interest. I use Quicken 2006 DeLuxe for my personal finances on one machine, and I also use it on an older machine to keep books for our home owners association. The old machine is on it’s last leg and I was thinking of trying to do them both one one machine. I couldn’t find anything in Quicken help on how to do it. I first thought I could create a seperate directory and do a backup and restore, but was afraid the data would get comingled. Would this work? And what about all the saved reports, and categories, etc. I hope you can help. thanks.
A-1:
You can have an unlimited number of company Quicken files on the same computer and switch back and forth between them. Before I made all of our clients upgrade to QuickBooks, most of them were on Quicken and I had hundreds of their files on my computer. I like to set up separate folders for each client just for ease of locating; but each client folder had multiple Quicken data files, covering their personal and corporate finances, as well as multiple years. As long as each company file has a different name, the program doesn’t mix them up.
So, all you need to do is copy the Quicken data files to your new computer, either directly or via Backup & Restore.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Q-2:
KerryI really appreciate you quick response. Thanks so much. Do the reports, categories, etc follow the data files? That is, are the reports, categories, etc. for my personal quicken file seperate from the ones for the homeowner reports?
A-2:
Each file will have its own saved reports and other data, with no reference to any of the other files. There is no commingling of any kind between the data files because you can only have one open at a time.
As I said, I used to have literally hundreds of different Quicken client data files on my computer and would switch back and forth between them with no problems. It’s that way currently with QuickBooks data files.
Good luck.
Kerry
Follow-Up:
KerryThanks a lot for helping. If I could, I’d steer some business your way.
Posted in QB | Comments Off on Quicken and Multiple Files
Posted by taxguru on February 1, 2007
Why should we expect our imperial rulers to take the simple approach to dealing with the mystical Tax Gap, when they can use their voodoo to make the tax system even more complicated and impossible to comply with?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
The key to e-filing?
Posted by taxguru on January 31, 2007

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The key to e-filing?
Employee Expense Reimbursements
Posted by taxguru on January 30, 2007
Q:
Subject: 1099-MISCHi Kerry,My daughter is a salaried employee. During the past year she received reimbursement for work-related travel expenses via an allowed mileage rate. She just received a 1099-MISC reporting the total of the reimbursed amounts as if it were compensation. The amount is too small to be deducted as an employee expense. My tax software wants to treat this as taxable income which hardly seems fair or appropriate. What should she do? Thanks.I forgot to mention that the amounts are being reported under Block 7, Non-employee expenses.
A:
She needs to list all of her personally incurred out of pocket business related expenses, including appropriate miles on her car on Form 2106. The reimbursements received should be reported on Line 7 in the appropriate columns. As the Step 3 portion of the 2106 will show, if she received more in reimbursements than her expenses were, the excess amount only will have to be shown as income on Line 7 of her 1040. If her net expenses were higher than the reimbursements, that excess will be entered on Schedule A.
If she doesn’t have enough deductions to itemize and uses the standard deduction, she should still include the 2106 and Schedule A with her 1040 just to show IRS that the amount from the 1099-MISC has been reported in the proper place (Line 7 of the 2106). If these schedules aren’t included with the 1040, IRS could very easily mistake the 1099-MISC amount as unreported income and send your daughter a bill for taxes on that in a few years’ time, plus interest and penalties. I have seen that happen on several occasions.
Your daughter should really be working with a professional tax advisor to make sure she is claiming all of the out of pocket business expenses to which she is entitled.
I hope this helps.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Employee Expense Reimbursements
Timing of Income Recognition
Posted by taxguru on January 30, 2007
Q:
Subject: Income recognition problemHi Kerry,I love your blog, esp. the cartoons, and I had a question for you. I runa website where I earn affiliate income and I use the cash accountingmethod (where you recognize income when it’s paid, not when the work isperformed) with my sole proprietorship. My problem is that the programwill recognize monies paid out on Dec. 31st via check as part of myearnings in 2006 on the 1099 and I didn’t know if I had to as well andwhether that discrepancy would be a problem.Thanks,
A:
I’m assuming that you’re referring to how to handle a check to you that was printed on 12/31/06, but not actually received by you until sometime in early January 2007.
By not having constructive or actual receipt of the money, you are correct that you do not have to pay tax on it on your 2006 income tax return, even if the payor has reported it to IRS as 2006 income. The way I have long handled this very common situation is to include the full 1099 amount on the Schedule C line for gross revenues and then on a line below that, enter a negative amount for the check not received until 2007, with a description of what happened. This way, the IRS computer will match the 1099 amount and the actual amount of income you are paying tax on will be accurate.
You then need to be sure to make the same kind of adjustment in the opposite direction on your 2007 Schedule C. You need to add the January 2007 payment received to the 2007 1099 amount.
You really should be addressing issues such as this with your own personal professional tax advisor. If you don’t have one, you should know how I feel about that if you have been reading my blog for any length of time.
Good luck. I hope this helps.
Kerry Kerstetter
Follow-up:
Hi Kerry,
Thank you so very much for the response and you understood my poorly explained question perfectly! And yes, after reading your blog for several months, I do know your stance on hiring a professional and I have considered it – I just haven’t gotten all my docs together so I have been putting it off.Thanks again and if you ever have blog related questions, feel free to shoot me an email 🙂
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Timing of Income Recognition
Posted by taxguru on January 29, 2007
Some 1099 forms will arrive late – And most likely with errors. This is just one of the many reasons why it’s not a good idea to try to rush a tax return out too quickly. Be sure to take plenty of time to make sure everything is as accurate as possible.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
SUV Shopping By Weight
Posted by taxguru on January 28, 2007
Q-1:
Subject: Corp. tax deductionHello Kerry,Is this vehicle rated ok for a one time full purchase price tax deduction for our corporation?ModelTK10906 -2007 YUKON XL DENALI -AWDGross Vehicle Weight Rating3360 kg (7409 lb)Purchase price of 2007 Yukon XL is approx. $55,900.00.Thanks for your help,
A-1:
Since the Denali is an SUV, its first year Section 179 deduction is limited to $25,000. If it were a pickup truck, the maximum would be $108,000.
The rest of the cost over the first $25,000 would be depreciated over five years.
On a related note, I checked on the info that the local Chevy dealer was passing on in their ads. They weren’t saying that the tax law changed as of 12/31/06. They were only pointing out the obvious fact that calendar year taxpayers had to buy a new vehicle by 12/31/06 in order to claim it on their 2006 tax returns. Since your corp tax year doesn’t end until later, your deadline is later than those who use December 31 for their tax year.
I hope this helps.
Kerry
Q-2:
Hello Kerry,
Is a Chevrolet Avalanche Truck ok as a one time full purchase price tax deduction for our corporation?
Is an open bed truck the only kind of a vehicle that is ok for an one time full purchase price tax deduction?
Thanks for your help,
A-2:
The rules for which vehicles weighing more than 6,000 pounds are subject to the $25,000 Section 179 limit are on my blog here.
“To not be subject to the limit:
I) is designed to have a seating capacity of more than 9 persons behind the driver’s seat,`(II) is equipped with a cargo area of at least 6 feet in interior length which is an open area or is designed for use as an open area but is enclosed by a cap and is not readily accessible directly from the passenger compartment, or
`(III) has an integral enclosure, fully enclosing the driver compartment and load carrying device, does not have seating rearward of the driver’s seat, and has no body section protruding more than 30 inches ahead of the leading edge of the windshield.’.”
With the Avalanche, it would need to weight over 6,000 pounds and have an open bed at least 6 feet long.
This sounds similar to a discussion we had last year about a Denali, which I actually posted on my blog.
Good luck.
Kerry
Posted in 179 | Comments Off on SUV Shopping By Weight




