Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 349,099 hits
  • Posts By Day

    June 2026
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Vote For NOTA

Posted by taxguru on October 27, 2006

I’ve long supported the idea of allowing people to vote for NOTA rather than having to choose the lesser evil. Leaving an elected office empty wouldn’t be any worse than filling it with the kind of spendaholics that we have to choose from.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Vote For NOTA

Posted by taxguru on October 26, 2006

Taxifornia, here we come – And people get upset at my reference to my former home state on the Left Coast as the PRC?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on October 26, 2006

Accounting students help audit white collar crimes – A great idea.  Why just teach the students about old cases from textbooks, when they can dig in and work on real life ones?  And it’s not like there’s a chance of ever running out of real life cases to work on.  Also, as every real world accountant knows, the hands-on approach will teach the students a hundred times more practical skills than any textbook study possibly can.

 

Go Daddy Domain Names

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Working With Corps

Posted by taxguru on October 26, 2006

 

Q:

Subject:  C Corp questions
 
Hi,
 
I found your website while researching the following:
 
LLC filing as C-corp question

——————————————————————————–

Could you please give me some feedback on the best way to handle the following?

1. 2005 1120 was filed showing consulting fees as an expense. The consulting fees were actually paid to the sole shareholder. There is no payroll set up for the corp. How should this be handled on the shareholders return? Any changes for the corp return?

2. Sole shareholder personally owns the truck which is used 100% for this C-Corp. Mileage has previously been claimed on this vehicle in a prior year (before corp) as unreimbursed business expense. How would it be handled now that it is totally used for corp business? Could the C-corp lease the vehicle from him?

3. Home-Office deduction for C-corp? Would it be best to lease the office space to the corp?

Any suggestions are greatly appreciated!


A:

There are far too many options to consider and possible scenarios that can be used to achieve your goals for me to even begin giving you specific advice via this medium.  There are pros and cons to each of the various options you mentioned, as well as dozens you didn’t.

You will need to work directly with an experienced tax pro who can analyze your unique circumstances. In fact, you were crazy to set up your corp without the advice of a qualified tax pro because s/he could have steered you in the best direction for some things that cannot be changed, such as the fiscal year.

I wish I could help; but I already have too many clients to take care of properly; so we are still trimming back on the difficult clients and are not accepting any new ones at this time. 

Unfortunately, we don’t have anyone specific to whom we could refer you. I did recently post some names and links for some like-minded tax pros around the country.

If you haven’t already done so, you should check out my tips on how to select the right tax preparer for you at.

In regard to the consulting payments made by your corporation to you, you need to report them on Schedule C of your 1040, which, after any related expenses you may have paid personally (+ home office, etc), will be subject to the 15.3% self employment tax.  A good tax advisor can help you find other ways to draw money out of your corp that aren’t subject to SE tax.

Amending things to reclassify those payments as W-2 wages would be a very costly mistake, subjecting you and your corp to a lot of penalties with both IRS and your state tax agency; so it would be most prudent to continue with the way those payments have already been classified, as non-employee compensation (1099-MISC) consulting.

I wish I could be of more assistance; and I wish you the best of luck.  

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Working With Corps

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

New tax song?

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2006

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on New tax song?

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2006

From the November issue of Practical Accountant:

What’s Different About Holistic Financial Planning?

Work with Clients To Prevent Fraud

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2006

10 mistakes that made flipping a flop – Learning from other persons’ mistakes is a much better way to learn what not to do than making them yourself/. This guy’s venture into get rich quick real estate investing is a textbook case in how to really screw things up. 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on October 24, 2006

Find what your mutual fund fees really are – They’re as sneaky as our rulers in DC are at hiding the true costs.

 

Figuring IRA Withdrawals When Your Beneficiary Dies, and Essential IRA Records – From Gail Buckner

 

Corporations vs. LLCs – From Nolo

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Confusion Over Section 179

Posted by taxguru on October 20, 2006

 

Q:

Subject: quick question 

 Kerry,

Hi there- it was great to find your site.   I have a quick question on the Section 179 deduction – and please forgive my lack of expertise in the tax law: say you spend $100K on equipment – does that mean that you totally deduct that amount, saving ~$40K (assuming 40% tax rate?).  Does the ~$400K limit mean that you can save only up to approximately 40%*$400K = $160K in taxes?  How do you quantify what you spend on all Section 179 eligible items  – just adding them up?  It seems weird to me that the fed would actually penalize a company for making >$400K in capital expenditures that would fit the Section 179 law.

Also, can you claim this tax on money spent on upkeep and maintenance on equipment?

Thanks for listening~

A:

While using a taxpayer’s tax bracket percentage as a guide can give you a quick & dirty idea of the tax savings from a deduction, such as Section 179, the actual savings will be different because of the sneaky way in which taxes are actually calculated, such as using AGI as a trigger to reduce or eliminate several tax credits and deductions.  Any item that reduces AGI will have more of a tax saving impact than just the tax rate percentage.

You are misinterpreting the $400,000 issue ($430,000 for 2006).  What the tax code does is phase out and eliminate the Section 179 deduction for any taxpayer that has acquired a huge amount of new qualifying business equipment.  This is intended to eliminate this tax break for what our rulers consider un-deserving “evil big businesses” and focus this special deduction on smaller companies.  However, any company acquiring that much new stuff will still be claiming a substantial normal depreciation deduction, especially if it chooses to use an accelerated method of calculating it.

In regard to qualifying the amount spent on new qualifying equipment, any business that intends to do so must have a good set of accounting records and can run reports of the new items posted to the equipment fixed asset accounts. 

Costs posted to expense accounts, such as repairs and maintenance don’t qualify for the Section 179.  However, since you are already deducting those costs as normal operating expenses, it ends up working out better that way.

I hope this helps you better understand this issue.  If you personally are involved in running a business that may be considering utilizing it, you should be working directly with a professional tax advisor who will be able to better illustrate how it will affect your unique situation.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

<a href="about:Banner HPage_468x60

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Confusion Over Section 179