Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 675 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 372,103 hits
  • Posts By Day

    November 2026
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Posted by taxguru on September 3, 2005

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Home Sale By Surviving Spouse

Posted by taxguru on September 2, 2005

Q:

Subject: Selling my home question

I read a recent article of yours relating to getting a $250 per person exclusion when selling your home. That was very informative, but I have an additional question. My wife died a couple of months ago. Can I claim two deductions if I sell my home in the same year that she passed away? I will be making more than $250K profit on my home and this might influence my decision to sell now or next year.

Thanks,

*** in PA

 

A:

 I’m sorry to hear of your loss. 

You do really need to be working one on one with a tax pro.  That is never a more important consideration than after a major life changing event such as you are going through.

To specifically apply the residence sale rules to your situation, there is a very big twist.  Essentially, there is no need to claim both of the $250,000 exclusions because your wife’s half of the profit has already been wiped out.  When a person passes away, her heirs receive most of her assets at what is called a stepped up basis, which is the item’s fair market value at the time of the person’s death.  This means that all of the profits that had accumulated during her lifetime have literally been wiped off the books. 

What this means for you as the surviving spouse is that your personal cost basis in the home is now made up your half of the original basis (which is normally what you paid for it plus capital improvements) plus the new stepped up basis for the other half.  If you sell the home, that is what you would be using in the calculation of your profit.  You could then exclude up to $250,000 of profit on your 1040, assuming that you have been living there at least two out of the previous five years.  That exclusion amount would be prorated if  you have lived there less than two years.

Because PA is not a community property state, you only receive a stepped up basis on half of the home.  Surviving spouses in community property states actually have the total basis of their homes stepped up, effectively wiping out all of the accumulated capital gain.

Some assets don’t have this new stepped up basis.  For example, most often pre-tax retirement accounts are still going to be subject to tax when you make withdrawals.  This is another reason why you absolutely must be working with a tax pro who can properly advise you on all of the tax twists that are now part of your world.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Home Sale By Surviving Spouse

Donating Vehicles – New IRS Form

Posted by taxguru on September 1, 2005

I’ve written a lot on the issue of donating vehicles to charities and the abuses by people claiming much higher values than they would actually sell for.  As a result, our rulers in DC passed a law late last year limiting the deduction to whatever amount the charity was able to sell it for.  This law took effect as of January 1, 2005. 

In typical fashion, IRS has come out with a new form (1098–C) for the charities to fill out documenting the donations and sales amounts.  You can download pdf versions of  the 2005 Form 1098–C and its instructions from the IRS website.

IRS’s Announcement 2005-66
(This announcement will appear in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-39, dated September 26, 2005.)

The IRS has released new Form 1098-C, Contributions of Motor Vehicles, Boats, and Airplanes.

The form is used by donee organizations to report the contribution of qualified vehicles to the IRS under new IRC section 170(f)(12). The form may also be used to provide the donor with a contemporaneous written acknowledgment of the contribution.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Donating Vehicles – New IRS Form

IRS Raises Interest Rates

Posted by taxguru on September 1, 2005

Effective as of October 1, 2005, the rates they charge will go up by a full percentage point, to 7.0%.

I have updated my Quick Reference page accordingly.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IRS Raises Interest Rates

Deducting MBA Costs

Posted by taxguru on September 1, 2005

Q:

Subject: Audit Question

Dear Tax Guru,

My husband is being audited for his 2003 return. He finished his MBA in May 2003, began working in September 2003 and deducted his last semester of tuition fees when he filed his return. Apparently a tax expert gave a seminar in school explaining why MBA students can make this deduction, but maybe he was mistaken. Anyway, my husband is not working in the same field or for the same company that he left when he took time off to go for his MBA. Do you think there is any justification he can use for claiming this deduction?

Thanks in advance for your help,

 

A:

It sounds as if your husband misinterpreted the rules for deducting education costs.  As long as I’ve been in the tax business (over 30 years), this has been one of the craziest Catch 22 type rules.  Basically, you are only allowed to deduct education costs related to the profession you are already in.  Education costs incurred to enter new professions have never been deductible. 

I’ve always thought this law to be counter-productive in regard to the country’s work-force, which should be encouraged to learn the skills necessary to adapt to the changing business environment, such as factory workers learning how to use computers.  Unfortunately, the words “Logic” and “Congress” are as incompatible as any two words could be.

It doesn’t look good for your husband in regard to salvaging this deduction.  He will owe the extra tax plus interest.  However, the penalties that auditors routinely toss in are completely negotiable and can be waived if your husband can convince the auditor that this was an accidental misinterpretation of the law.  If he hasn’t already done so, he should also make sure he has deducted all of his job hunting costs.

Another lesson that you both should take from this is the wisdom of using a professional tax preparer instead of trying to interpret the laws and regulations on your own. 

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter


Update:

Employee Could Deduct Cost of MBA That Helped Him Move Ahead in Company

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Deducting MBA Costs

Interesting articles from Web CPA

Posted by taxguru on September 1, 2005

New rules for alternative vehicle purchases, leases

 

IRS S corporation audit plan draws mixed reviews

 

 Letting go of business – Succession planning.

 

Judge to tell IRS to reopen collection bids – Others, such as the Soprano and Gotti families, are anxious to get the contracts to use their special skills to collect money for the IRS.

 

TIGTA finds IRS is lax in combating identity theft – Not good, especially considering how much of our vital info IRS has in its possession.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Interesting articles from Web CPA

Posted by taxguru on August 31, 2005

Frist Still Promising Estate Tax Repeal Vote; Grassley Outlines Compromise

…Grassley called the chances of achieving full repeal “zero,”…

…the “boundaries” of a “nebulous” deal likely encompassing an exemption of between $4 million and $6 million and a 15 percent to 35 percent tax rate.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Home Sale Due To Financial Difficulty

Posted by taxguru on August 31, 2005

Q:

Subject: sale of home

If I own a home for less than 2 yrs (more than one year), and need to sell due to financial reasons…meaning I’m unable, as a single able to maintain the home’s expenses, what are the tax consequences on the gains.  I’m estimating gains to be around $50,000.  Current earnings vary and she’ll probably earn around $40,000 on income from employment.  At what rate does she have to pay the tax on the gains, and is there some way around having to pay that tax?  Thanks


A:

You should consult with a tax pro and go over your reasons why you are no longer able to afford your home.  If it is because of an unforeseen event, such as losing your job or an illness, you will qualify for the pro-rated exclusion of gain.

You can see more on this on my website.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

thank you
 
 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Home Sale Due To Financial Difficulty

S Corps & Loan Qualifications

Posted by taxguru on August 31, 2005

Q:

Subject: Section 179 expense

I don’t know if you can help me or not but I am trying to analyze tax returns for a borrower who has an S Corp and on his Sch E there is income loss under the Section 179 heading is this income that I should be able to use when qualifying my borrower or is this truly a deduction like when Sch C people write off expenses?  I would appreciate any assistance you could give me.  Thank you.

 

A:

As pass-through entities, S corps are taxed very similarly to sole proprietor Schedule C, as part of the owners’ 1040.  Section 179 expense for new business equipment purchases is required to be shown on a separate line from the other net income or loss from the S corp because it has its own limitation on the 1040 based on the Section 179 deductions from other K-1s, as well as directly from Schedules C, E and F on the 1040.

I know that different lenders have different policies in regard to using a borrower’s  AGI for loan qualification purposes.  Some lenders use the reported AGI with no adjustments of any kind allowed.  Others do allow an add-back for some kinds of quasi-personal expenses that were run through the business schedule for tax purposes. 

Normally, the Section 179 deduction wouldn’t (and definitely shouldn’t) be one of those adjustments.  There may be other quasi-personal expenses buried in the S corp’s net bottom line.  You should ask your borrower and his/her tax preparer for details on those kinds of things if you are so inclined to make that kind of adjustment. 

Just adding back the Section 179 would not be appropriate unless your borrower confesses to running personal use assets through his/her business.  In that case, you may also want to factor in possible future IRS tax or fraud charges, since they are currently putting S corps under their microscope as I explained in a recent blog posting.

I hope this helps.

Kerry Kerstetter

 Follow-up:

Thank you very much and this helps greatly. 

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on S Corps & Loan Qualifications

Posted by taxguru on August 31, 2005

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on