
Posted by taxguru on March 30, 2005
Know the Real Price Of New Mortgages – Low monthly payments aren’t always a good thing, especially if there is negative amortization, with the loan balance increasing every money.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Pulling Numbers Out Of Thin Air
Posted by taxguru on March 29, 2005
IRS Sees $300 Billion Gap – Since the media continue to accept these kinds of statements from IRS as absolute fact, I will once again remind everyone that these highly publicized tax gap figures are nothing more than WAGs (wild ass guesses). I have done my own research with IRS personnel as to their source of the unreported income and its tax. They have admitted to me that such measurements are impossible to make with any definitive accuracy. They claim that their made up numbers are as accurate as anyone else’s because there is no way to dispute them. It’s just the standard IRS scare tactic for tax season.
Again, as I’ve said for decades, the premise that everyone is a tax cheat is bogus. I have reviewed thousands of tax returns prepared by taxpayers and other tax pros and can unequivocally state that people pay too much in taxes through a combination of ignorance and incompetence in filling out the tax forms. I have seen plenty of people who even intentionally overpay their taxes as a way of trying to keep IRS off of their backs. In the private market organized crime world (as opposed to the government sponsored one), this is usually referred to as “protection” money.
So, I feel extremely confident in declaring that the tax gap in this country is not anywhere close to a negative $300 billion; but is quite possibly a positive figure, with people paying too much. My numbers can’t be verified or disputed with any scientific accuracy; but at least I’m honest about that fact. Not like the IRS and their lackeys in the media who will use their imaginary figure to justify more money and power for taxpayer harassment.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Pulling Numbers Out Of Thin Air
Posted by taxguru on March 29, 2005
There is no end in sight of the people who are quick to set up corporations and LLCs, without the foggiest idea of what those entail, just because someone told them that was the cool thing to do.
Q:
Subject: Poor me
Hi,
Great tax info. Now my request for the free advice.
I set -up a C-Corp March 23, March 2004. We have approx. $30,000.00 in deductions (or at least I thought so). However, since we were just starting the biz, we have not sold anything…or made a profit.
Our tax person says we are out of luck as far as the deductions go (since we are not an S Corp) and we must pay the $800.00 annual fee regardless. We have not made any sales, since we are still forming.Anything good you can suggest or advise?Thanks,
A:
If any of this surprises you, it means that you and your tax advisor didn’t adequately discuss the details of owning a corporation in the PRC before you set it up.
From the moment your corp is chartered, until all of the proper papers have been filed to dissolve it, it is required to pay the $800 per year minimum tax, whether any actual business is conducted or not. That is the way it has always been.
The $30,000 of deductions in your C corp aren’t lost; so there’s no real reason to be upset . It’s true that you can’t deduct them on your 1040. However, they will create an NOL (net operating loss) that can be carried over into future years, offsetting the corporation’s income from those years.
If there won’t be any corp income for a few more years, you may want to consider setting up a Schedule C on your 1040 and paying the expenses with your personal money so that you can obtain some tax benefit from them sooner.
I’m not sure what you are looking for from me; but it sounds like you need to work more closely with your tax advisor.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on March 28, 2005
Accounting is back in vogue – “Financial CSI” is an interesting way to look at what we do.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on March 27, 2005
IRS May Tax Your eBay Sales – This is nothing new. If you sell something for more than it cost you, the gain is taxable. It has always been that way.
If you have a lot of money coming in and don’t show it on your tax return, IRS will assume everything you sold was free and assess taxes on the full amount received. As I’ve always said, over-documenting things on tax returns, such as eBay sales that had losses or break-even, is a good self defense measure. If you don’t formally declare that there is no taxable net profit, IRS can and often does assume that every penny received is pure taxable profit.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on March 26, 2005
Q:
I have a friend that is going through a very nasty divorce in the state of Georgia. The divorce has been made more complicated by a joint interest held in a beach house with another couple. They are going through negotiations at this time to liquidate their interest in the beach house, but they aren’t sure how that liquidation is going to be taxed. Husband makes 80k, wife makes 50k. They are jointly to receive 115k (57.5k each) from the sale of their interest in the beach house. They arrived at this figure by having the house appraised (450k) less the note still remaining on the house (200k) dividing by two since there are two couples co-owing the home and then dropping the price 10k to motivate the other couple to buy them out.
I am nowhere near an accountant and don’t claim to be but have done some online research for my friend and as I understand it…..since the house was appraised with contents, that amount along with other landscaping improvements can be deducted from the amount of the capital gains. And then if I am reading your site correctly, the remaining amount would be taxed at 15%. Now….big question is, is the sale also included in their “income” which would put the wife in a higher tax bracket? Or, is it simply noted somewhere else as capital gains?
I would appreciate any light you could shine on this question. Thank you so much for your help!
A:
There are several issues that “your friend” needs to cover in regard to this matter when consulting with a tax pro, such as the following.
How was the beach property being used? If it was rental property, there are issues of depreciation recapture and the possibility of using a tax deferred 1031 exchange to reinvest the proceeds into new real estate.
If it was only used personally, there won’t be any depreciation recapture and it doesn’t qualify for a 1031 exchange.
As you describe it, the husband is selling a 25% share of the property and the wife is selling a 25% share. Using your figures, each would be reporting a sales price of $107,500. IRS treats the $50,000 relief of debt that each will be receiving the same as cash.
You didn’t say how much the property cost. When calculating the gain on the sale, you need to properly determine your cost basis in what is being sold. This would start from 25% of the original purchase price, plus any capital improvements, as well as any furnishings and appliances that were purchased and included with the property. Depreciation that had been, or could have been, claimed reduces the basis.
The effective tax rates on the gain will be affected by their other income. A lot of other income could very easily push part or all of the gain into the higher 15% Federal rate, and would be calculated using the worksheets on page 2 of Schedule D.
There will also be Georgia income tax to pay.
A tax pro can give more precise advice based on your friend’s particular circumstances.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on
Posted by taxguru on March 26, 2005
Q:
I read with interest your answers to questions concerning 1031 exchanges, particularly converting a rental home to personal use.I have a rental home acquired in May 2004 thru a 1031 exchange. Due to some unforeseen circumstances, I may need to move into this home and make it my personal residence as of August 2005. My tax preparer indicates to me that if I live in it for 2 years I will be able to use the tax free exclusion due to the fact that the exchange was done before October 2004 when the 5 year rule was put in place.He indicates that any exchanges or sales done before October 2004 are covered by the old 2 year rule.
I would appreciate your opinion on this matter.
A:
I covered this here:
http://www.taxguru.net/2004/10/selling-converted-exchange-property.htmlKerry Kerstetter
A reminder to please use the search tool at the top of this page to see if I have already discussed a topic before sending me questions. I use it all the time myself to go back over the several years of postings. I do not have time to repeat myself or send everyone the links to individual postings.
Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on


