Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

Archive for February, 2007

Claiming Daughter?

Posted by taxguru on February 11, 2007

Q:

Subject: daughter’s taxes
 
Kerry,  Our daughter is a student at NAC in Harrison.  She has lived in Harrison since July with my mom and has worked part time at Home Depot since July.  So this year she will have her own W2 form.  I am guessing that she will need to file her own taxes?  I just want to be sure before I tell her to do it. 

 

A:

That’s not necessarily the case.  It’s a bit of a gray area. 

Since she was a student, you are still allowed to claim her as a dependent if you have been paying for more than half of her living expenses during the past year, even if she isn’t in your home. If you’ve been giving her money for living costs while she was at your mom’s, you can count that as part of your support contribution.

If your mom has been covering your daughter’s living costs while she was there, and you covered them for the early part of 2006, it may be that neither of you paid more than 50% of her living costs for the entire year of 2006; which would mean that your daughter would have to claim her own personal exemption.

The real test that make most tax sense is based on how much she earned during the year.  If she made more than $5,150, she will save on taxes by claiming herself.  If she made less than that, there is no need for her to claim herself and it would be better tax-wise for you to claim her, as long as you met the more than 50% support test.

I hope this isn’t too confusing.

Kerry

 

TaxCoach Software: Are you giving your clients what they really want?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Claiming Daughter?

Recording Stocks In QB

Posted by taxguru on February 11, 2007

Q:

Subject: Quickbooks for Investing
 
I noticed that you stated QB is fine for recording investments and don’t need Quicken’s ability to track fluxuating values in the stock.  I agree, and from a business point of view, your costs don’t change daily and remained fixed.  When you sell the stock, you derive your COGS from this data.
 
However, I noticed that you didn’t mention other costs associated with the purchase and sale of individual blocks of stock, such as commissions paid on purchase and on sale?  How well does QB record this information.  Do I have to do a PO every time I buy and a Invoice every time I sell, just to have a place to add commissions to the costs, or does QB have an easier way to handle this?
 
Thanks!


A:

When you make the entries for stock purchases, you need to post the total cost, including commissions.

When you sell stocks, you can either post the gross sales price to the SalePrice Income account and the Expenses to a sub-account for selling costs under that; or just enter the net sales price (gross less commissions) into the SalePrice account.  Since more and more 1099-Bs from brokers are reporting the net sales price instead of the gross price, the latter approach may be easier when it comes to reconciling the QB reports to the 1099-Bs.

Your professional tax advisor should be able to help you set up the accounts and sub-accounts in your QB file that will enable him/her to more efficiently prepare your Schedule D.

I have been posting these transactions through checks, deposits and general journal entries.  I have never used POs or invoices to do this. 

Good luck.  I hope this helps.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

 

 

Posted in QB | Comments Off on Recording Stocks In QB

Career Counselors & Future IRS Agents?

Posted by taxguru on February 10, 2007

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Career Counselors & Future IRS Agents?

A Different PETA

Posted by taxguru on February 9, 2007

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Different PETA

Section 179 and Trade-Ins

Posted by taxguru on February 8, 2007

Q:

Subject: Guru needed
 
Hello,
 
I found your site and have read a good portion of it — and learned quite a bit.  Thank you!
 
I was wondering if you could answer a question regarding 179 vehicle expensing:
 
In 2004 I puchased a new Chevy Suburban (GW > 6,000 lbs) for my business (real estate investing) and depreciated the entire vehicle in that year (~$50k).
 
Since then, the limit has been reduced to $25,000, but (I think) there remains some additional accelaerated depreciation available.
 
My question is:
 
If I trade-in (or sell) my 2004 suv in 2007 for a new (>6,000 lb gw) suv in 2007, what are the tax consequences with respect to cost recovery and depreciation of the new vehicle?
 
I understanding I’ll be trading up, no cash received (substantial cash out), and that it will be a like-kind asset exchange.  I’m hoping there’ll be
more/new depreciation to take (over a short period of time).
 
Thank you,

 

A:

I have covered this issue in a number of posts over the last few years; but a quick review would be useful for new readers.

While many people don’t see much difference between a vehicle trade-in and a sale, it can make a huge difference tax-wise. 

If you have depreciated (via Section 179 + normal depreciation) the cost basis down to an amount much lower than the vehicle’s current fair market value, a sale will trigger taxable recapture of some or all of the depreciation and Sec. 179.

If you trade the vehicle in for one with a value of equal or higher amount, there will be no taxable recapture.  Per Form 8824, the remaining undepreciated cost basis of the old vehicle, plus any additional amounts paid via cash and debt will become the cost basis of the new vehicle.

In regard to claiming Section 179 on the new vehicle, the rollover cost portion is not eligible; but the newly paid (via cash or debt) amounts are.  Normal deprecation is available for the amount not deducted under Sec. 179.

The opposite would be the case if the vehicle is worth less than the depreciated coat basis.  A sale would enable a deductible loss; while a trade would require the loss to be rolled over and added to the cost basis of the new vehicle.

This is why I always give my clients a copy of their next year’s depreciation schedule along with their tax returns, and advise that they check the asset’s depreciated cost basis (Book Value) before deciding whether to trade a vehicle in or sell it in an independent transaction.

Your personal professional tax advisor should be able to run the numbers for your vehicles and show you the consequences of both options.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

TaxCoach Software: Are you giving your clients what they really want?

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Section 179 and Trade-Ins

Corp Double Taxation

Posted by taxguru on February 8, 2007

Q:

Subject: Question regarding C corporations and double taxation

Hi Kerry,
 
I just visited your web site and found it very informative.  I’m sure you’ve heard this before but I attended a Real Estate Investors seminar and they spoke of setting up a C corporation for asset protection and tax savings purposes.  And of course, for a fee, they would help us do that.
 
Later, another investor from the seminar and I decided to purchase a Mobile Home Park in Mabelvale Arkansas.  I am from Connecticut and my investment partner is from California.  We decided to go ahead with setting up a C corporation as had been suggested at the seminar.  So now we each have C corporations set up in Nevada.  Those two C corporations manage XYZ LLC.  That XYZ LLC is then the single member of another LLC that ownes the Mobile Home Park.
 
The reason why I am writing to you is to get your opinion on the whole thing.  In my opinion, it seems to be overkill.  It seems to be very layered and I’m not sure if we will gain any tax savings from it.  I think we probably could have just created an LLC that owns the Mobile Home Park and get some good insurance and be done with it. 
 
I understand that as the rental income profit from the Mobile Home Park is placed into the two C corporations we will have to pay tax on that income.  However, how do we get money out from the two C corporations without having to pay tax again (double taxation)?  If there is double taxation then what is the purpose served by the C corp?  Or is that not an issue in this case? 
 
Anything you can offer on this subject would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thanks,

 

A:

There are far too many options to consider and possible scenarios that can be used to achieve your goals for me to even begin giving you specific advice via this medium.

You will need to work directly with an experienced tax pro who can analyze your unique circumstances. I wish I could help; but I already have too many clients to take care of properly; so we are still trimming back on the difficult clients and are not accepting any new ones at this time. 

Unfortunately, we don’t have anyone specific to whom we could refer you. I did recently post some names and links for some like-minded tax pros around the country.

If you haven’t already done so, you should check out my tips on how to select the right tax preparer for you.

You definitely need to make sure whoever you work with has experience in multi-state taxation.  Even though your corporation may be chartered in Nevada, which has no State income taxes, the fact that the property is located in a taxable state (Arkansas) means that your corp and/or LLC will have to file income tax returns with that state.  This applies to any state in which you have property or are physically present to earn money.  You may not have to actually pay any Arkansas tax if the net income has been shifted out of state properly; but you do have to file an income tax return or else the State DFA will assume that all of the gross receipts are pure profit.

Any good tax advisor can help you avoid double taxation of C corp income.  There are many ways to do that.

I wish I could be of more assistance; and I wish you the best of luck.  

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Corp Double Taxation

1031 Identification Deadline Is Firm

Posted by taxguru on February 8, 2007

Q:

Subject: Exchange Question
 
New question from a client, that I have not encountered before. If 3 prospective replacement properties were identified for an exchange within 45 days of the sale of a property and none of the 3 remain available for purchase, can my client substitute a replacement prospect, close on it within the 180 day time frame and still defer the capital gains tax consequence?

 

A:

Based on the way in which you described your client’s situation, the answer is a very big NO. 

The only statutorily eligible reasons for an extension of either the 45 or 180 day deadlines are when the property has been affected by a Presidentially declared disaster or if the taxpayer is on active duty in a combat zone.

If the taxpayer just dawdled and let other people buy up those listed properties, IRS has no sympathy for him. 

This is why we have always advised working diligently on the acquisition phase of the exchange as early in the process as possible; ideally while the disposition phase is still in progress.

Hopefully, this lesson won’t be too expensive for your client and he will be more on top of things the next time he attempts an exchange.  If the potential tax bill is substantial, your client may want to make the new owners of the properties substantially increased offers so that he can still acquire them within the 180 day deadline.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on 1031 Identification Deadline Is Firm

Posted by taxguru on February 7, 2007

What Is The IRS Thinking? Forbes magazine looks at how IRS has been implementing the new more generous rules for non-spouses to roll over inherited IRA accounts.


Basic common sense tips from Nolo Press
.

Seven Steps to Lower Your Taxes 

Top Seven Tax Deductions for Seniors and Retirees

 

Netflix, Inc.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

I’ll buy a vowel..

Posted by taxguru on February 5, 2007

Created at Atom Smasher by KMK

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on I’ll buy a vowel..

Posted by taxguru on February 4, 2007

From the latest Intuit ProConnection Newsletter:

Numerous Tax Changes Now in Place for 2007 and 2008 – Good look at what’s in store for the next two years; at least until the next tax law.  Includes a handy summary for clients in MS Word format.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on