
Gifts From Parents
Posted by taxguru on October 3, 2009
Q:
Subject: gifts of 13,000
Good Afternoon,
If I am reading it correctly, it states that a married couple can receive up to $52,000 a year.
Would it be done like this, My mother writing a check out for 13,000 to both my husband and I and then my dad writing a check for $13,000 to both my husband and I. Now the money would be out of the same account with both their names on the check. One signing 2 checks and the other signing the other 2 checks. We are in Ct and they are in North Carolina. We are trying to buy a house and they want to give us money. Thank you.
A:
Gifting strategies are the kinds of things you and your parents should be discussing with your own personal professional tax advisors because there are several different ways in which they can be structured.
I noticed some aspects of gifting that you appear to be confused about.
First, there is no maximum amount of gifts that can be received. For the recipients, gifts are exempt from income tax. However, if you were to be given non-cash items, such as stocks or real estate, that have appreciated in value since your parents purchased them, there could be tax consequences when you sell them because you are required to maintain your parents’ cost basis.
From the givers’ (your parents) perspective, there is also no maximum that they can give away in a year. However, if either of them were to give any person more than $13,000 during a single calendar year, they would be required to file a Gift Tax return (Form 709) to report that to IRS. There is also a lifetime exemption of one million dollars of gifts per giver, so even if they exceed the annual $13,000 limit, they wouldn’t have to actually pay any gift tax until they have used up the million dollars.
There is a provision in the tax law allowing for married couples to split their gifts if they are made by only one spouse from his/her separate money. This enables both spouses to use their $13,000 annual exemption.
In the proposed plan that you mentioned, it sounds as if the bank account is jointly owned, so each could give you $13,000 and your husband another $13,000 without the need for any gift tax returns or gift splitting. Added all together, that would be $52,000.
This was a rather lengthy way to say that your plan appears valid. However, there are ways to transfer even larger amounts of money without exceeding the annual limits that should be discussed with your own personal professional tax advisor.
For example, if you needed $200,000 right now, your parents could gift you the $52,000 in 2009 and loan you the additional $148,000. In future years the principal of the loan could be forgiven as gifts in those years in increments of $13,000 or whatever the annual limit is in those years.
I hope this helps.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Follow-Up:
thank you so much for getting back to me.
Posted in Gifting | Comments Off on Gifts From Parents
Killing the Golden Goose…
Posted by taxguru on September 28, 2009
Risky business: States tax the rich at their peril – Too many of our rulers have short term mentalities and have no concern for the long range consequences of their decisions to steal as much money as they can from the “evil rich.”
I am very happy to see that rather than just bend over and accept these kinds of financial rapes, more people are voting with their moving vans.

New Jersey, New York and California Have Worst Tax Climates for Business, Tax Foundation Says
Posted in StateTaxes | Comments Off on Killing the Golden Goose…
Posted by taxguru on September 28, 2009
IRS scam now world’s biggest e-mail virus problem – These phony IRS emails that I mentioned a few weeks ago are still floating around the net. I have been receiving at least one copy each day since then. As this article explains, they contain a nasty computer Trojan virus; so be extra careful when encountering these scam emails.
Posted in scams | Comments Off on
You can’t trust government financial predictions…
Posted by taxguru on September 27, 2009
How many people would willingly invest everything they own with someone who has a lengthy track record of being 100% wrong on every single prediction? Any sane investor would stay miles away from anyone with such a history. However, that’s the case with anyone who believes a single financial fact touted by our rulers in DC.
Job losses, early retirements hurt Social Security – This is just one more reminder that, whenever our rulers in DC predict the costs and finances of a government program, they are off by huge magnitudes. The naive way to look at this fact would be to assume that they just made honest miscalculations. The more realistic assessment is that they lied through their teeth in order to sell the programs, knowing full well that nothing could be done to them when the truth became clear.
That is exactly what we are facing today. Every single one of the cost figures being used in the current fight to socialize health care is being intentionally understated so as to con gullible people into accepting it. By the time the truth emerges that the actual costs are hundreds of times more than promised, just as with Social Security and Medicare, the politicians responsible for selling the programs will be long gone and the people too dependent on it to ever go back.

Posted in comix, scams | Comments Off on You can’t trust government financial predictions…
Section 179 & Losses
Posted by taxguru on September 27, 2009
Q:
Subject: Sec 179 depreciation.
Hello, just found you on the web and had a question regarding this tax law. If our business takes a loss the first year (this year) can we still use this for the over 6,000 lb. commercial truck we purchased this year also?
Please let me know and thanks.
A:
Section 179 is very explicit on the fact that it cannot be used to cause or increase a net loss for the year.
The first year bonus depreciation doesn’t have that restriction, so it can be used to generate a net loss for the year.
Your own personal professional tax advisor should be able to properly handle the appropriate depreciation deductions for all of the capital assets for your business. Do not attempt to do this on your own.
Good luck.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Section 179 & Losses
Bleeding Off Income
Posted by taxguru on September 27, 2009
Q:
Subject: C Corp Question
Good Morning,
I am looking at forming a C Corp, based on your advice online. One thing I do not understand is how one bleeds off income at the end of the personal tax year (12/31) back to the corporation, to limit personal exposure to income tax. Can you explain that a little bit for me? Also, if (as I anticipate to do) I form the C corp, are you available as a CPA for my company? And if so, at what cost?
Thanks for the information.
A:
The easiest way to bleed off income from your 1040 is to pay your corp for “Business Services” or “Management Services” and deduct it on the same schedule(s) where you are reporting your income (C, E, or F).
If all of your income is from a W-2, you will need to deduct the Services on Sch. A.
As you can see below, I am still not accepting new clients.
Good luck. I hope this helps.
Kerry Kerstetter
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bleeding Off Income
Five Seasons
Posted by taxguru on September 27, 2009
Family and friends of tax pros have long known that there are five seasons per year.

Video tribute to Charlie Rangel
Posted by taxguru on September 26, 2009
Posted in Rangel, video | Comments Off on Video tribute to Charlie Rangel



