Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 343,795 hits
  • Posts By Day

    May 2026
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Posted by taxguru on November 16, 2007

Democrats’ ATM, the AMT – A good piece by David Freddoso on how this coming tax season could be even messier than normal.

Posted in AMT | Comments Off on

Insurance companies love the death tax…

Posted by taxguru on November 16, 2007

Many people wonder why supposed capitalists, such as Warren Buffett, are fighting so hard against the attempts to repeal the Estate (aka Death, Inheritance) tax. It isn’t just their obvious love of Marxism; but good old fashioned personal greed. Insurance companies, such as those owned by Mr. Buffett, make a fortune by selling policies to cover estate taxes. No more estate taxes would dry that cash cow up in a hurry.

There is some good coverage of this topic on National Review Online:

The Oracle of the Death Tax

Death tax is a lifeline for insurance industry

Thanks to David Freddoso at The Corner for this info.

Posted in comix, DeathTax | Comments Off on Insurance companies love the death tax…

Pushing Sec. 179 deductions into next year…

Posted by taxguru on November 16, 2007

Q:

Subject: Section 179

 

Questions:

 

If a company begins in November 2007 can the section 179 be taken in the 2008 calendar year???

 

Thanks

A:

Your question is a bit vague, so I’ll see if I can hit on what you’re after.

If you’re asking if a calendar year business buys new equipment during 2007, can it claim the Section 179 expensing deduction for that equipment on its 2008 tax return, the answer is NO.  Equipment acquired and placed into service during 2007 must be claimed on the 2007 tax return.  Equipment acquired and placed into service during 2008 will be claimed on the 2008 tax return.

I’m assuming your question has to do with the fact that there won’t be enough net income on the 2007 tax return to justify any Section 179 deduction, so it would be better suited to 2008 when you will be receiving more income.  As your professional tax advisor should be explaining to you, you can probably get the same effect as you desire by actually entering the full Section 179 on your 2007 tax return.  The tax program will then apply the income limitation test, which will make all or most of the Section 179 carry over to the 2008 tax return, where it will be available to be offset against the 2008 net income.

Another possible scenario would be that you have a new C corp with its first fiscal year ending some time in 2008, such as September 30.  In that case, any new business equipment purchased and placed into service by 9/30/08 will be eligible for Section 179 on that tax return, which will technically be a 2007 1120.

I hope I addressed your point.  Your professional tax advisor should be able to give you more relevant advice, better suited to your actual circumstances.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Follow-Up:

Kerry:

 

Yes, you have answered my question.

 

Thank you very much

 

 

 

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Pushing Sec. 179 deductions into next year…

Mugged by the Insane AMT…

Posted by taxguru on November 15, 2007

Posted in AMT, comix | Comments Off on Mugged by the Insane AMT…

Posted by taxguru on November 15, 2007

As always, the latest Intuit Pro Connection newsletter has some interesting articles.

Home Foreclosures Trigger Tax Headaches

IRS Revises Circular 230 Rules

Entity Comparison Chart

Accountant Incorporation Guide (24 pages PDF)

Look for New Twists to Year-End Capital Gain Planning

 

There are also some QuickBooks related references, which I have posted on my QuickBooks Tips blog.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Flat tax choice?

Posted by taxguru on November 14, 2007


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in comix, FlatTax | Comments Off on Flat tax choice?

Targeted Taxes…

Posted by taxguru on November 14, 2007

Posted in AMT, comix | Comments Off on Targeted Taxes…

Everybody needs to worry about the Insane AMT…

Posted by taxguru on November 13, 2007


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in AMT, comix | Comments Off on Everybody needs to worry about the Insane AMT…

Shot by the Insane AMT…

Posted by taxguru on November 12, 2007

Posted in AMT, comix | Comments Off on Shot by the Insane AMT…

SUV weight is important…

Posted by taxguru on November 11, 2007

Q-1:

Subject: Toyota Highlander Hybrid sec 179?

 

Hi.  I found your explanation of the sec 179 deduction for schedule C  filers very helpful.
Question:  The Toyota Highlander Hybrid Limited 4WD lists a GVWR of exactly 6,000 lbs.  How would that be treated for Sec 179 purposes?
Thank you so much. 

A-1:

You are correct in pointing out the fact that a vehicle weighing exactly 6,000 pounds is subject to the luxury car rules and very minuscule depreciation and Section 179 deductions because the exemption is spelled out as vehicles weighing more than 6,000 pounds.

If the more generous depreciating and Section 179 deductions are important to you (obviously), what many people do is to have the dealer install an optional piece of equipment onto the vehicle that will add at least a few pounds to the manufacturer’s listed weight of the standard option-free model.  I have actually heard of auto dealers offering things they call “Tax Savings Options Package” that are intended to take a vehicle with a starting weight of around 5,000 or 5,500 pounds and increase it to over the magical 6,000 pound threshold.  These usually contain such weighty options as towing packages and luggage racks. 

With your desired vehicle starting at 6,000 pounds even, any option that becomes a permanent part of the vehicle should be enough to put you over the qualifying weight.

Good luck.  I hope this helps.

Kerry Kerstetter

Q-2:

Thank you so much.  Your answer is extremely helpful. 

 

I have one last question on this topic.  The IRS seems to use GVWR as the standard by which vehicle “weight” is measured, but I read  somewhere that if it is a passenger vehicle, the “curb weight” is the weight that has to be over 6,000 lbs.  If this is correct, that would present a problem with the Highlander, which has a curb weight of  about 4850 lbs.  It would be hard to imagine having enough options to push it over 6,000 lbs.  curb weight.   However, I am hopeful that this was misinformation as I have been unable to find any reference to the distinction between curb weight and GVWR in the IRS publications.  Every reference I have found uses  GVWR. 

 

Is there any reason to worry about curb weight in a vehicle that is a “unibody” style SUV (not built on a truck frame) or is GVWR the  critical weight to keep above 6,000 lbs  for all vehicles?

 

Again,  thank you.  What an awesome site!

A-2:

I did address this issue in a recent blog post

Since SUVs are generally considered to be in the passenger auto category, they would have to use the lower unloaded curb weight.

Good luck.

Kerry


Follow-up:

THANK YOU!!!!  I went to the link and read it.  Not what I wanted to hear but sooooo very helpful.

 

TaxCoach Software: Finally! Plain-English Tax Planing That Builds Your Business!

 

Posted in 179, Vehicles | Comments Off on SUV weight is important…