Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 334,008 hits
  • Posts By Day

    April 2007
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for April, 2007

Income Shifting

Posted by taxguru on April 10, 2007

Q-1:

Subject: Shifting money between companies
 
Dear Kerry,
 
On your website you’ve talked about the merits of owning multiple corporations with different fiscal years, one of them being the ability to shift money back and forth to reduce/postpone taxes.
 
I had a CA S-corp, and based on your advice I set up an OR C-corp last year, with fiscal year end on Jun 30. I intend to use this corporation for other businesses, but I also wanted to have the flexibility to shift money between the 2 companies if needed. 
 
However, I spoke with my new accountant today, and he suggested that any money transfers (by invoicing of course) between such companies would be considered “related party” by IRS, therefore not be deductible, be borderline (maybe flat-out) illegal, would raise immediate flags, and very likely result in penalties. 
 
What is your advice? Should I look for another accountant? 
 
Thanks very much,

 

A-1:

It’s obvious that you need to find a different professional tax advisor; one with some real world experience shifting income between entities.

Income shifting is not illegal and has been a standard business tactic for literally centuries.  As long as the amounts are reasonable for what they represent, and are treated consistently by both sides (payee and payor), IRS will accept the numbers. 

A few years ago I had an IRS auditor tell me that as long as both sides are using the same method of accounting (cash or accrual), they won’t even bother looking at the related party transactions.  If they are using different methods, then the auditors will look to see if there is any artificial manipulation going on.  That’s why I make sure all of our clients and their related entities are using the cash basis, and IRS has never had any problems with any of the income shifting we have been doing for over 30 years.

For example, back before I sold off my Bay Area practice, I had some clients for whom we had set up a Calif corp and a Washington State corp. Each tax year, we made sure to shift all of the corp profits out of the high tax PRC into tax free Washington.  This is frequently done with Nevada corps as well.

Anybody who claims that income shifting between related entities is illegal needs some more education before s/he is safe to consult with actual real world clients.  When interviewing potential tax pros to use, make sure to cover this topic up front and only choose a person who can give you some examples of how this tactic can be used in your situation.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Q-2:

Hi Kerry,
 
Thank you. I appreciate your detailed response. You’ve mentioned that you had your clients use the cash method in all their accounts. Likewise, would it be okay to use the accrual method instead, as long as it’s consistent across all companies. Are there any restrictions on that specific to S-corps?
 
Thank you.

A-2:

You’ll need to work on this with your own personal experienced professional tax advisor.

Personally, I’m genially against using the accrual method because we do a lot of income shifting between individuals and their corporations, and individuals are always on the cash basis. 

The conversation with the IRS auditor I mentioned previously was during an examination of a high income individual’s 1040.  When the auditor asked about payments between him and his corporations, he specifically said that because the corps were on the cash basis, he would skip looking at them; but if they had been on the accrual, he would have had to examine the corporations as well.

Good luck.

Kerry

 

Follow-Up:

Okay, thank you very much for your time and advice.

 

 

TaxCoach Software: Are you giving your clients what they really want?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Income Shifting

Income Tax Fever

Posted by taxguru on April 10, 2007

Another good look at the tax mess from Tom Briscoe

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Income Tax Fever

Out of sight, out of their minds…

Posted by taxguru on April 10, 2007


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Out of sight, out of their minds…

Posted by taxguru on April 9, 2007

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Making everyone equal

Posted by taxguru on April 9, 2007

A staple of the drive-by media are stories about the horror of income and wealth inequality. Underlying these tales of how terrible our society is for allowing such disparities is the only solution, central government confiscation and redistribution. I hope it’s not necessary to remind folks where this concept originated (thank your Karl Marx).

I was very surprised to see this analogy in a comic from the Arkansas Democrat’s political cartoonist:


(Click on image for full size)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Making everyone equal

Not everything in tax law is explicitly stated…

Posted by taxguru on April 9, 2007

Q:

Subject: Section 179-Are assets used in commercial rentals eligible for the Section 179 deduction?
 
Good Afternoon TaxGuru,
 
TurboTax allows me to take a Section 179 deduction for tangible, personal-property assets used in my commercial rental activity.  It does not allow this treatment for residential rentals. 
 
Here’s my problem.  I can’t find anything in Publication 946 to support TurboTax’s position, but find it difficult to believe that this huge company could make such an error.
 
My accountant says I can’t take the Section 179 deduction; TurboTax says I can.  Would you please steer me to the relevant IRS regulations and rulings? 
Perhaps you could add it to your online article about the Section 179.
 
Thank you kindly.

A:

You are approaching this bit of research into the Section 179 law from the wrong perspective if you expect it to specifically spell out every single possible type of asset that would qualify for first year expensing.  That isn’t how most laws are written.

It’s been almost 35 years since I took Business Law in college, so I don’t remember the specific legal term; but I do recall the concept that most laws allow certain things in a broad sense and any exclusions from that coverage are required to be specifically stated. In other words, if a law says movable business equipment can be expensed in the first year, we start from the premise that this includes everything.  Then, the law and regulations specify certain things that are not to be covered by this law.

As you have most likely already seen, most descriptions of ineligible property include the following:
   “Used predominantly to furnish lodging or in connection with the furnishing of lodging (with the exception of hotel/motel operations).”

If the law were intended to rule out property used in any kind of rental activity, it would say so and not make the very definite distinction of only mentioning lodging (aka residential).  By only mentioning that kind of rental activity, it allows us to operate under the assumption that otherwise eligible property used in any other kind of rental activity would not be ineligible.

There is also the fact that, for as long as the Section 179 deduction has been in existence, landlords of commercial properties have been claiming it for many kinds of equipment used in conjunction with those rentals and IRS has not had any problems.  Many of my clients are commercial landlords and I frequently use Section 179 on those rental schedules, and IRS has never once disallowed it.

I realize this may not be as detailed an answer as you were hoping for; but it’s the best I can come up with during this heavy crunch time.

I hope it helped you understand this issue a little better.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Follow-Up:

Kerry:
 
Thank you for your excellent advice.  You  answered my question and taught me an entirely-new-way-of thinking.
 
This is an incredible gift.  I will revisit your site regularly to check out your advice and watch for client openings.
 
Thanks again.
 
Your raving fan,

 

 

 

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Not everything in tax law is explicitly stated…

Politickles

Posted by taxguru on April 9, 2007

Every year around this time (Tax Season), F.R. Duplantier graces us with some of his limerick style looks at the fun topic of taxes.

This year’s offerings:

QUESTIONABLE DEDUCTIONS
You expect to have something to show
When you get your first job and some dough;
Then you get your first check
And you say, “What the heck!
Where the hell did the rest of it go?”
 
 
A TAXPAYER’S LAMENT
Of my annual earnings Uncle Sam will extract
Fully two-fifths, as a matter of fact.
That’s quite a large portion, but what’s got me burned:
I’ll never see that much in service returned, ETC.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Politickles

Tax on Gifts

Posted by taxguru on April 8, 2007

Actually, gifts are one of the very few types of income that are exempt from income tax on the recipient.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tax on Gifts

Truck Depreciation

Posted by taxguru on April 8, 2007

Q:

Subject: Section 179 truck depreciation question

Dear Kerry,
  I have a tax question I’m hoping you can help me with.
     We bought a truck in 2006 for our business and are going to section 179 depreciate it’s value for the next 5 years. If I deduct $5000 (depreciate) it’s value this year, can I deduct more next year, (in the event we make more money and I need more deductions.)
    Is the depreciation set once you place something in service? Is there anyway I can increase the amount on the second or third year?
        The truck cost 22,000 dollars, so it’s be nice to depreciate it just enough each year so as to not have to pay taxes. So maybe $5000 this year, and $6000 the next, but maybe only $3000 the third year. Is this possible?
         Please let me know ASAP as taxes are due soon.
                     Thank You,

 

A:

You can’t just change the depreciation methods and amounts each year.  There has to be a consistency.

That said, there are a number of ways in which you can depreciate the truck.  For example, you can use straight line or accelerated regular depreciation.  You can claim part or possibly all of the cost of the truck as Section 179.  If your taxable earned income rules out an actual current year full deduction, the excess Sec 179 can be carried over to be used on the 2007 4562, and so on.

You really need to be working with an experienced tax professional because it is obvious that you are guaranteed to make mistakes that could cost you tax dollars, as well as get you into trouble with IRS. Handling the tax matters on your own is absolutely crazy.

In regard to the tax returns deadline, you are not likely to find a good tax pro in the next two weeks because we are all already swamped.  You should do your best guesstimate of how much you will owe with the 2006 tax returns and send that in with an automatic four month extension in order to give yourself adequate time to locate and start working with a tax pro. 

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

 

 

 

Posted in 179 | Comments Off on Truck Depreciation

Changing QB File Names

Posted by taxguru on April 8, 2007

Q:

Subject: I need to change a QuickBooks file name

Hey Kerry,

I have upgraded to QuickBooks Pro 2007 and loaded the files from 2002 and input all the checks from 2003 and 2004 to bring the file current. ( because I couldn’t find the updated file you sent back to me from the 2003 taxes)

Now, I have the 2004 stuff entered and the files have the names associated with 2002.  I would like to change them and can’t figure out how to do it and still keep them “on the radar” for QuickBooks.

If you think it’s easy enough, I would appreciate your help, sent to me at home tonight as I’m just about ready to close this place down and head home to my other job. 

Gracias senor~

 

A:

While you are not in the QB program, use Windows Explorer or whichever file manager program you prefer (we use PowerDesk), to go into the folder where you have your data files. QB 2007 uses three data files for each company, with extensions of QBW, QBW.ND, and QBW.TLG

You can right mouse click on each file and select “Rename” to change it to whatever you  prefer.  As long as the file’s extension is the same as before the change, the program will open it with no problem.

I hope this works for you.

Kerry

 

 

The best book on QuickBooks Premier Editions

 

Posted in QB | Comments Off on Changing QB File Names