Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 690 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 330,169 hits
  • Posts By Day

    October 2007
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for October, 2007

Posted by taxguru on October 27, 2007

Posted in comix, Kids | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on October 26, 2007

Posted in comix, PropertyTax | Comments Off on

When a nickname fits…

Posted by taxguru on October 26, 2007

Posted in Accounting, comix | Comments Off on When a nickname fits…

Sales Tax Scammers

Posted by taxguru on October 26, 2007

Q:

Subject: Tax /Ethical Question

Dear Mr. Kerstetter,

As an aspiring accountant, ive encountered an ethical dillema at my job. I currently work for a retail establishment(non accounting related job)where we sell high end luxury fashion goods. A few weeks ago, i noticed a transaction that wasnt “right”. A sales associate sold some merchandise to her client that was over $100,000 in store. Come to find out, the sales associate and assitant manager did not charge the client tax(the tax was approximatly $9500). To “dodge” the tax issue, the assistant manager shipped out an empty box filled with catalogues and possibly magazines to give the impression that the merchandise was being sent out to the client at an out of state address via FedEx. The thing is, items that exceed over a certain amount(im guessing over $10,000) typically need to be sent out insured by an armoured security delivery service. My question for you is what kind of laws has the sales associate and assistant manager violated? Im under the impression this is tax fraud and quite possibly, mail fraud. I feel that this transaction should be reported for I feel its very dishonest yet i know the outcome will most likely be termination of those employees. I dont want people to lose their jobs but at the same time these kind of things should not go unspoken. Thanks


A:

This sounds very similar to the infamous art dealer cases in New York a few years back, where several very famous art dealers received prison sentences for helping their customers evade state sales taxes by pretending to ship paintings out of state.

So, what your superiors are doing is obviously very illegal and will come to light eventually.  Anyone the government determines was part of this conspiracy to evade the taxes will most likely be prosecuted.  The prosecutors will have to exercise their own discretion as to how vigorously they want to prosecute anyone they learn knew about the scheme and failed to report it.

Since you are aware of this ongoing crime by some people at your employer, you do have a dilemma as to how to proceed.  I can think of a few options for you.  You didn’t say who your employer is or where you are located; so I’m not sure how many of these will be applicable for your particular situation.

At a minimum, you should report this illegal activity to the top CEO of your company, as well as to the person in charge of the company’s Internal Audit department.  When I was employed in the Internal Auditing profession, there were a number of instances where I was alerted to criminal activity by employees and I was allowed to follow those through with my own investigations that led to employee terminations and criminal prosecutions.

I’m assuming that the top corp big-wigs are unaware of this illegal activity and will welcome the chance to clean house of the lawbreakers before it ends up being discovered and costing the company a lot of money and bad press. 

Of course, if the company’s top brass are in on the tax evasion scheme, this won’t do much good.  In that case, the next option will be much more appealing to you.

Most tax agencies pay rewards to whistle blowers for info leading to the recovery of evaded taxes.  Turning in the lawbreakers to your state sales tax agency could result in a nice financial reward for you. 

In addition, if you are serious about a career in accounting, a job with the sales tax agency investigating this kind of thing at other companies could very well be possible if you make an impressive presentation of your findings when you turn in the tax scammers at your company. 

Of course, other options are to just remain quiet about this and stay at your current job or leave and find employment at a more law abiding company.

Good luck.  I hope this helps give you some ideas as to a course of action.  Please keep me posted as to how this plays out.

Kerry Kerstetter

 

Follow-Up:

Dear Mr. Kerstetter,

Thank you so much for your reply. I am actually going to quit my job at the end of the year for I just was offered an internship at a public firm for the busy tax season! However, im still trying to evaluate my decision on if I should report this or not. There is so much unethical things that happen on a store level in addition to this that I could report, yet nobody else has the courage to stand up to my superiors. I will definently keep you posted if I do decide to take action against them. Have a great day!

 

 

 

 

Posted in SalesTax | Comments Off on Sales Tax Scammers

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2007

Rangel’s ‘Mother of All Tax Reforms’ Gets Abortion – Scott Ott has some fun with the recently announced tax plan by the Dims.  

I’m not planning to waste much time dissecting this ridiculous tax hike package other than to agree with some commentators that this is what can be expected under the third term in office by the two headed president

 

Posted in TaxHikes | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2007

Posted in audits, comix | Comments Off on

Sharing the Client Guide

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2007

Q:

Subject: New CPA loves your agreement…

Hi,

Your website is terrific.  Where did you get that fabulous client service agreement?  Did you buy from someplace?

I would love to use it with some minor modifications.  There is another CPA who uses a very similar agreement which makes me think that there are templates out there with interesting client service agreements out there but I am unable to find them.

Let me know your thoughts and have a great week,

A:

Actually, I first wrote that from scratch over 20 years ago and have been tweaking it ever since.

It’s not surprising that you’ve seen it from other tax pros.   Many other tax pros have  asked for permission to use it for their clients and I’ve never had a problem with that.

Please feel free to use it any way that you feel appropriate for your clients.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Follow-Up:

Hi Kerry,

 

Thank you so much for letting a novice like myself use your hard work.  I certainly do appreciate that!  It is such a good idea to post your fees and have a positive outline of your expectations.  It saves a great deal of surprises and heart ache in the long run.

 

Thanks again for your support and best wishes to you.

 

  

TaxCoach Software: Are you giving your clients what they really want?

  

Posted in Clients | Comments Off on Sharing the Client Guide

A different kind of Flat Tax?

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2007

Posted in comix, FlatTax | Comments Off on A different kind of Flat Tax?

2008 Medicare Rates

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2007

From a reader:

Subject: Social Security & Medicare – 2008 & Beyond

Thanks for the SS information for 2008 as well as 2008 tax rates & info.

Here are the new monthly Medicare premiums for 2008 based on 2006 MAGI:

2008 Medicare Premiums based on MAGI for 2006 [AGI + TAX EXEMPT INTEREST].

You Pay If Your Yearly Income* is
Single
$96.40 MAGI=$82,000 or less
$122.20 MAGI= $82,001-$102,000
$160.90 MAGI=$102,001-$153,000
$199.70 MAGI=$153,001-$205,000
$238.40 MAGI-Above $205,000

Married Couple
$96.40 MAGI=$164,000 or less
$122.20 MAGI=$164,001-$204,000
$160.90 MAGI=$204,001-$306,000
$199.70 MAGI=$306,001-$410,000
$238.40 MAGI=Above $410,000

*[Modified Adjusted Gross Income (Includes Tax-Exempt Interest)]

In 2006, I was able to save a friend from jumping into a higher premium bracket by about $500 with a few end-of-year minor investment transactions.

Your predictions about what will happen to SS benefits for upper bracket payers is likely spot on. Favorable treatment of dividends & capital gains is likely to end also.

I’ve started a “Doomsday” folder as the assault on the evil rich “if the two-headed president” [or others so inclined] is elected. My ultimate doomsday strategy? All munis all the time.

Speaking of munis there is a vital tax case [Kentucky v. Davis] that will be heard before the U.S. Supreme Court on November 5, 2007
[http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2007/10/municipal-bonds.html].

My reply:

Thanks for that additional info on the 2008 means tested Medicare premiums.

That is also a very interesting case you referenced, on the ability of State tax agencies to give tax free status to only interest from in-state muni bonds. I wasn’t aware of it. That has been a logistical problem for taxpayers who move between states, and whose holdings change from tax free to taxable status as a result. I wonder if a positive (for taxpayers) finding in this case will result in a lot of amended State income tax returns.

Thanks again for sharing that.

Kerry


Posted in MediCare | Comments Off on 2008 Medicare Rates

Posted by taxguru on October 25, 2007

MAKING TAXES SIMPLER & FAIRER – Another reminder of the exponential growth of the insane AMT; from its original goal of sticking it to 155 super rich folks to the current situation of over 25 million victims.

 

Posted in AMT | Comments Off on