Tax Guru – Ker$tetter Letter

Helping real people win the tax game.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 685 other subscribers
  • Blog Stats

    • 314,914 hits
  • Posts By Day

    August 2004
    M T W T F S S
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • Subscribe

  • Special Pages

Archive for August 11th, 2004

Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2004

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2004

Ninth Circuit Affirms Order Enjoining Irwin Schiff and Two Associates – Another dose of reality for this tax protesting scammer. Names of all of his customers will be turned over to authorities; so anyone stupid enough to fall for his line of crap will be looking at a possible stay in the old gray bar hotel.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2004

Tech Company Settled Tax Case Without an Audit – Could there by some hanky panky going on at the IRS?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Impossible Goal?

Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2004

I’m not sure why this person thought there was a way to avoid taxes on the sale of some highly appreciated real estate without doing a 1031 exchange; but I guess it doesn’t hurt to ask.

I Bought a piece of land I thought we would build on. But plans have changed. I can now sell it for 2ce as much as I paid for it just a few months ago. How can I avoid capital gains and not do a 1031? Or if I have to pay capital gains what is the %?

thank you,

My Reply:

If you don’t want to do a 1031 exchange, you will be forced to report the profit, which will be taxed at your normal income tax rates since you have owned the property for less than 12 months. Your actual tax rates (Federal + State) will obviously depend on your other levels of income.

You can spread the tax hit out over a number of years if you carry back part or all of the sales price. You can then use the installment method to report the gain each year as you receive the principal payments.

Your personal tax advisor should be able to help you with this. It’s very basic taxation law.

Good luck.

Kerry Kerstetter

Posted in 1031 | Comments Off on Impossible Goal?

Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2004

Bush Says National Sales Tax Worth Considering

Bush: Sales tax in, income tax out?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

Multi-State Taxes

Posted by taxguru on August 11, 2004

My recent piece on the need to file tax returns with non-resident states prompted this email from a reader.

Hi –

I was reading your blog entry about “Missouri Tax Fishing” and wondered about my situation. I am a sales manager for a company based in California. I live in CA and I have an office in CA. However, I travel to Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, plus British Columbia & Alberta in Canada on business. The trips are to visit customers and work with local sales rep. I am out of state on these trips 30% – 40% of the time.

I am physically working in these other states. Does this mean I must file multiple state returns?

Thanks,

My Reply:

The proper way to handle this has a lot to do with whether you are a W-2 employee or self employed. From your description, it sounds as if you are a W-2 employee. Let me know if that is an incorrect assumption on my part.

With W-2 employees, your employer’s payroll department should be keeping track of the amount of time you spend physically working in each different state (USA & Canadian) and reporting your annual W-2 wages accordingly. I have had some clients where they had several W-2s from their employers with several different State Wages amounts in as many as a dozen different states, including occasionally Canadian states.

As a W-2 employee, you are generally safe if you file tax returns consistently with how your employer has reported your payroll in the State Wages box on your W-2. The state tax agencies will be matching those up with your state tax returns.

If your employer is not properly allocating your payroll between states where you physically work, your employer has some serious potential liability to those other states when they are caught. State tax agencies are always looking for this kind of thing; so the current reporting situation could change. In cases where the employer is nailed for not properly allocating wages between states, the related penalties are normally assessed against the employer and not the employees.

If you are self employed, the burden of keeping track of the amount of time you spend and money you earn inside each state is on you. You are required to file tax returns with each state accordingly.

Good luck. I hope this helps.

Kerry Kerstetter

I later received the following additional info:

Kerry:

Thanks very much for the response — it was enlightening. I am a W-2 employee, but my employer reports all of my annual wages in my home state of CA. I have been working under these circumstances for 20 years with time at two major companies, and this is how both have handled things. I also know plenty of colleagues in the same industry working for different companies, and I have never heard of anyone getting wages allocated among several states.

I will have a discussion with my company’s Accounting Dept. Thanks again for getting back to me.

I wrapped this up as follows:

It sounds as if you keep a low profile when working in the other states.

Odds are that if the situation were reversed, and you were based outside of Calif and doing a lot of work there, part of your wages would be required to be allocated to Calif. That is the most aggressive state for snagging as many taxpayers as possible.

Kerry Kerstetter

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Multi-State Taxes